I enjoy reading this forum, but I'm struck by how much we associate talent with prominence at an early age - wrongly, in my mind.
At 15-20 years so many other factors influence how kids will perform against their peers. Not least, different speeds of physical development.
While there will always be examples of precocious kids excellent at 16 and becoming world beaters, in most cases there is less correlation than we'd like to think.
I'm no expert, but the factors that will indicate achievement across a career tend to be willingness to work hard, how one reacts to not being the best player in a squad or in a position, ability to learn, resilience to criticism and injury, resilience to success (of that makes sense).
So for many players, the crucial age of development is around 20-23. The setup seems great for u21s, but thereafter is really tough for players to develop, and I feel we often move players on before they've had time to prove... Denis Suarez, for example.
Basically, I wish we had a B side that could compete In the league competitively...
At 15-20 years so many other factors influence how kids will perform against their peers. Not least, different speeds of physical development.
While there will always be examples of precocious kids excellent at 16 and becoming world beaters, in most cases there is less correlation than we'd like to think.
I'm no expert, but the factors that will indicate achievement across a career tend to be willingness to work hard, how one reacts to not being the best player in a squad or in a position, ability to learn, resilience to criticism and injury, resilience to success (of that makes sense).
So for many players, the crucial age of development is around 20-23. The setup seems great for u21s, but thereafter is really tough for players to develop, and I feel we often move players on before they've had time to prove... Denis Suarez, for example.
Basically, I wish we had a B side that could compete In the league competitively...