Article 50/Brexit Negotiations

Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting because all of those concessions have been given the nod by Government that they could apply in the transition phase and of course thereafter they don't seem unreasonable as the price the UK might have to pay to get a comprehensive free trade deal. In fact it's not really possible to get a COMPREHENSIVE EU trade deal without accepting ECJ trade rules and standards ( individual MRAs you don't need it, but they're limited deals). Also May has not ruled out payments ( not 'vast' sums in her words, yeah right she would say that wouldn't she). And Govt are already backtracking big style on immigration , so all these concessions are possible.
So that could easily be Brexit couldn't it?


The major concern was the free movement of people I believe, and there have been overtures and whispers that this type of immigration could continue after Brexit so your implication that free movement may stay after negotiations could very well be on the cards. This however could be a time bomb for the Tories having swept up ukip votes and in the end not delivering.

May could actually deliver a soft Brexit if she doesn't get the result she wants through the ballot box, and a soft Brexit isn't a Brexit it'll be the concessions Cameron was after before the EU slapped him down and sent him off with nothing. I don't trust the Tories one iota but out of all the parties they have the closest idea of what many leave voters consider a viable extraction from the EU.

My only worry is that the Tories wont solve the unfettered access to this country for EU migrants in the same way she and the Tories didn't solve the immigration numbers from outside of the EU.
 
Calm down mate, calm down.
Thanks for replying to my post to Swiss Tony.
So from your answer I assume that if say as a price for getting a comprehensive ( ish ) free trade deal and the ability to have free trade deals outside the bloc ( which EU members cannot do), we agree to pay a large wedge to the EU each year , accept ECJ rulings on standards ,regulations, trade and commerce - which is necessary to trade with them - and agree favourable immigration terms for EU nationals ( whilst of course retaining control of our own borders), you would be happy with those compromises.
Its never been free trade, its been loaded to favour countries 3rd world mind, who have plenty to take but fuck all to give in return, so its loaded to dignify them a contribution which was only worth 10p in the pound and not 110p for an shiny cooking tomatoes. Jeez its done, support democracy or stew in its shit like the outers have had to for 40 plus years. Better still support your country, it always deserved better than being raped.
 
You overlooked the mad brexiteers on the tory back benches who are the real reason for her calling the election.

Apparently the announcement of the election has gone down very well in the EU. They see it as giving her much greater to scope to compromise on the divorce bill, transitional arrangements and trade.

On the election thread I have commented that having the ability to face down the extreme Brexiteers, along with game playing Remainers is among the reasons for calling this election.

She needs also to be able to face off against the game playing EU - who would have less scope to play games in the negotiations if she has a sizable majority.

I must get around to answering Len's questions on Red Lines, but amongst mine are not things like - there must be a immediate cessation of payments. I, like many others I am sure, just want us to leave - and leave in a manner that is a clear break with appropriate arrangements and agreements on matters such as trade without being tied to principles that leave us unable to manage our borders and control our own laws.

I recognise May will need to make, what could be seen by the 'Hard Brexiteers' has being betrayals, some compromises - she will also need to take some tough stances with the EU - it is negotiations.

Indeed the EU have signalled that negotiations will start in June after the election, but it would not be right to see this has them being 'fully happy' about the election being called. In fact overnight an EU diplomat has come out and 'advised' the UK population that "...it is not too late to avoid Brexit...." - that will probably work a bit like Obama's intervention.

Yes, May will be free of the controls of the Hard Brexit cadre and able to come to some compromises but she will also be free form the machinations that have been occurring at Westminster and also able to take some tough stances without fear that the final deal will get voted down.

The ideal outcome for the EU is that the UK effectively remains in the EU and that they continue to benefit from our money, either as a full member because the machinations led to us Remaining, or as a form of associate with key principles such as FOM applying. They had more chance of that if this election had not been called - now they will have to 'get real' in the negotiations, recognising that the UK is free to make tough decisions, e.g. on the flow of our money, as well as compromises.

All in all it is best that both 'sides' will now be able to get down to serious negotiations free from political game playing.
 
Last edited:
I will give you mine and imo, the vast majority of the rest amongst us who voted to leave.

Here it is.....

Are you ready for it......?

LEAVE! We voted to leave the EU. Get out. Have fuck all to do with it. Never pay a bean into it ever again.

No soft, runny, sunny side up brexit thats been invented post vote to try and make some sleep a little bit better at nights.

Leave means leave and it means brexit.

Does that help you len because i see you posting the same question every single day and regardless of the answer you get, you just keep on asking.

Are you waiting for an answer you like before giving it up or what?

It will be interesting to see Len's response to this and any others that are put forward - it will show just how genuine he was in his statement that he was 'seeking to move the debate on' or if in fact he was just intending to play a cheap game.

I have been suspicious that the intention behind his request is to repeat what I have seen previously since June - Remainers being unable to put forward their own arguments in a cohesive manner and instead simply sniping/picking holes and generally throwing stones at those of others.

That said, I tend to regard Len as being of more substance than others of the 'obsessed Remainer' type, so I will take part in his 'exercise'.

But as a word of caution to any keen Leaver - if you set out your Red Lines and describe what Brexit outcomes you would wish to see achieved, then you immediately become vulnerable to the 'sniping' - if that is the purpose of Len's request - which, as I say, I hope it is not.

This is because of the simple fact of how the negotiations will actually work. It will likely mean that nobody on here will get the full deal that they will have set out in their posts in April 2017.

Both 'sides' will have strengths and weaknesses and therefore both sides will secure some of what they want, fail totally in some areas and in others reach a compromise. Where those 'Wins/Losses/Draws' actually fall will depend on the strength of support each negotiating team is given to 'prosecute' each outcome. This is why it is important that the UK team are free of the demands of the hard Brexiteers and also of the slippery machinations that have been taking place at Westminster. This is also why it would be good for the UK to be able see/sow some level of discord amongst the 27 - which it is indeed entirely possible to do.

There is no 'deal' available on the shelf that can be described by any of us - it will evolve through the negotiations, based on the strength of each side's positions and the freedom that they have to play 'trump cards' and therefore any specific outcome that we can describe is vulnerable to compromise.

The 'game' that I was suspecting Ken might be playing (I hope that he is not) is similar to what the EU, through their sycophant Remainers at Westminster, have been trying to do since June in their continual requests for detail and the demands for a meaningful vote' on the final deal. As an example if they could have gotten May to state that she:

".....will stop all payments when we leave....." and also

"... whilst we will be leaving the Single Market we will secure a level of access to it through a trade agreement...."

Immediately all the EU negotiating team has to do is refuse to discuss any of that that until we have paid £60bn or whatever they decide to demand (thereby nullifying our Ace of Trumps). They could also say that any level of access to the single market, no matter how limited, is dependent on the annual contribution (as other nations make) of £10bn - or whatever demand they choose to make.

May is then snookered because she would have been stupid enough to make statements that left her a hostage to fortune - and of course had the intentionally wrecking (sorry I mean meaningful vote) amendment snuck through then the Remain dominated Westminster could simply vote the deal down based on it not achieving what the PM had set out as a Red Line etc. Of course this explains also why May must not take part in debates where she will be pressed to make such statements.

I think that I might first take time out to do some examples of that 'sniping' of Leave positions myself so that it would at least expose what Remainers are up to if they actually do start to play that cheap game because they have no substance of their own. It will also help expectations of leavers on here - because at the end of the day the 'deal' will be a 'negotiated settlement'.

Whilst I will set out my red lines in another posts - for me it will be in the form of some quite simply stated outcomes and open to the acceptance of a number of compromises.
 
Last edited:
It will be interesting to see Len's response to this and any others that are put forward - it will show just how genuine he was in his statement that he was 'seeking to move the debate on' or if in fact he was just intending to play a cheap game.

I have been suspicious that the intention behind his request is to repeat what I have seen previously since June - Remainers being unable to put forward their own arguments in a cohesive manner and instead simply sniping/picking holes and generally throwing stones at those of others and doing that in a manner that is a bit superior (in their own opinion).

That said, I tend to regard Len as being of more substance that others of the 'obsessed Remainer' type, so I will take part in his 'exercise'.

But as a word of caution to any keen Leaver - if you set out your Red Lines and describe what Brexit outcomes you would wish to see achieved, then you immediately become vulnerable to the 'sniping' - if that is the purpose of Len's request - which, as I say, I hope it is not.

This is because of the simple fact of how the negotiations will actually work. It will likely mean that nobody on here will get the full deal that they will have set out in their posts in April 2017.

Both 'sides' will have strengths and weaknesses and therefore both sides will secure some of what they want, fail totally in some areas and in others reach a compromise. Where those 'Wins/Losses/Draws' actually fall will depend on the strength of support each negotiating team is given to 'prosecute' each outcome. This is why it is important that the UK team are free of the demands of the hard Brexiteers and also of the slippery machinations that have been taking place in Westminster. This is why it would be good for the UK to be able see/sow some level of discord amongst the 27 - which it is indeed entirely possible to do.

There is no 'deal' available on the shelf that can be described by any of us - it will evolve through the negotiations, based on the strength of each side's positions and the freedom that they have to play 'trump cards' and therefore any specific outcome that we can describe is vulnerable to compromise.

The 'game' that I was suspecting Ken might be playing (I hope that he is not) is similar to what the EU, through their sycophant Remainers at Westminster, have been trying to do since June in their continual requests for detail and the demands for a meaningful vote' on the final deal. As an example if they could have gotten May to state that she:

".....will stop all payments when we leave....." and also

"... whilst we will be leaving the Single Market we will secure a level of access to it through a trade agreement...."

Immediately all the EU negotiating team has to do is refuse to discuss ant of that that until we have paid £60bn or whatever they decide to demand (thereby nullifying our Ace of Trumps) and also that any level of access to the single market, no matter how limited, is dependent on the annual contribution (as other nations make) of £10bn - or whatever demand they choose to make.

May is then snookered because she would have been stupid enough to make statements that left her a hostage to fortune - and of course had the intentionally wrecking (sorry I mean meaningful vote) amendment snuck through then the Remain dominated Westminster could simply vote the deal down based on it not achieving what the PM had set out as a Red Line etc. Of course this explains also why May must not take part in debates where she will be pressed to make such statements.

I think that I might first take time out to do some examples of that 'sniping' of Leave positions myself so that it would at least expose what Remainers are up to if they actually do start to play that cheap game because they have no substance of their own. It will also help expectations of leavers on here - because at the end of the day the 'deal' will be a 'negotiated settlement'.

Whilst I will set out my red lines in another posts - for me it will be in the form of some quite simply stated outcomes and open to the acceptance of a number of compromises.
I would refer you to my answer to blueinsa's post on page 161.
I have never been one who advocates revealing final negotiating positions subject to the caveat that you should not take up ridiculous positions that make you and the country look silly ( ' no deal is better than a bad deal' ) and which you have to reverse almost immediately ( no need for transition phases).
I have no plans to visit Hemel Hempstead.
 
Great being able to negotiate our own trade deals.

C99osuLXsAIsa4n
 
Great being able to negotiate our own trade deals.

C99osuLXsAIsa4n

Do we only employ one guy?

I mean, can't we get a temp in so that we can do more than one thing at a time and negotiate at around the same timing as we'll officially different trading zones?

Do they have to close a trading deal with Costa Rica before they can close one with China?
 
Great being able to negotiate our own trade deals.

C99osuLXsAIsa4n
Bloody Paul Ryan coming over here telling fibs only two days ago

The US stands ready to agree a free trade deal with the UK as soon as possible, Paul Ryan, the Republican speaker of the House of Representatives, has said in London. He also predicted that the UK would be able to sign a Brexit agreement with the EU, adding that the US, as a special ally, would be standing by the UK all the way through the talks

“This is one of the bipartisan messages I bring with me, I bring Democrats and Republicans here to this room to this country today, to say that the United States stands ready to forge a new trade agreement with Great Britain as soon as possible so that we may further tap into the great potential between our two people.”

He added that he assumed the UK would be able to get an Brexit agreement with the EU, saying: “I cannot imagine you will not and I just want you to know that as your special partner and greatest ally, we are going to stand with you through all of this. We want you as soon as the UK is ready and able to do a bilateral trade agreement.”.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/apr/19/paul-ryan-london-visit-us-uk-trade-agreement-brexit

Anyway we can't sign anything because we have no pens or ink in the pens or something.
 
she will also be free form the machinations that have been occurring at Westminster and also able to take some tough stances without fear that the final deal will get voted down.

Dictatorship of the executive over the legislature is what you mean. A blank cheque for May to do as she pleases in our name, to take us to a destination god knows where, in secret, with no scrutiny by Parliament and no effective sanction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.