mscenterh750
Well-Known Member
You surely are taking the piss, honestly because mahrez isn't fit to lace sterlings boots.He's better than Sterling.
Mahrez in.
You surely are taking the piss, honestly because mahrez isn't fit to lace sterlings boots.He's better than Sterling.
Mahrez in.
In that case it would be a smacked Fanny. Don't blame me for American terminology.What’s that saying across the pond, looks like a smacked arse?
You surely are taking the piss, honestly because mahrez isn't fit to lace sterlings boots.
Last Saturday we had a field day because Mahrez gave Simpson no protection at all. Sané was an easy out ball all afternoon. We don't need Mahrez.
He is better at dribbling and crossing and finishing.
Worse off the ball movement, work rate, less strength, less pace, three years older and still has only one decent season to his name.
It would be a completely nonsensical signing.
He's better than Sterling.
Mahrez in.
That's your opinion and that's fine. In my opinion Sterling is light years ahead of Mahrez in every department.He is better at dribbling and crossing and finishing.
The drugs don’t workHe's better than Sterling.
Mahrez in.