Pensioner arrested for murder

[BimboBob]

You are right the law is on his side but that doesn't mean that this may be challenged?


At present he isn't but until the inquest has been finalised into the cause of death then that can't be ruled out? If the pathologic finds something that brings into question the pensioners story of the events then ?

He's been told he wont face any more charges. By the Police. Who I would imagine know a damn sight more than you about the case.

 

[SWP's back]

and I am certain that this will come up in the court case.

There won’t be a court case against him ffs.

 

[SWP's back]

The moral case is clear the legal is not so clear.

It obviously is as the CPS isn’t touching it.

 

[SWP's back]

At present he isn't but until the inquest has been finalised into the cause of death then that can't be ruled out?

We and the police and CPS know the cause of death.

It wasn’t skin cancer.

So yes, yes it can.

 

[worsleyweb]

I would Knight him never mind a court case.

 

[PW]

He's been told he wont face any more charges. By the Police. Who I would imagine know a damn sight more than you about the case.

The burglars body would have been the subject of a Home Office Postmortem whilst the elderly chap was in custody. The pathologist would have documented all the injuries and in light of the fact that the cops and the CPS have said he has no case to answer the elderly gents account and version of events must be consistent with the pathologists report. It was never in doubt that he wouldn't be charged, as he had a defence in law. The big difference with this case and Tony Martin is that the latter shot Fred Barras in the back as he tried to escape through a window and Brendan Fearon in the legs as he ran off. Don't get me wrong I have no sympathy for either of them as in my view once you commit crime your rights are out of the window.

 

[inchy14]

That's it in a nut shell. If someone broke in my house I would do the same.

Not if he runs around for a bit first with you chasing him, you'd be fucked after 50 steps going off your park run time!!

 

[SWP's back]

The burglars body would have been the subject of a Home Office Postmortem whilst the elderly chap was in custody. The pathologist would have documented all the injuries and in light of the fact that the cops and the CPS have said he has no case to answer the elderly gents account and version of events must be consistent with the pathologists report. It was never in doubt that he wouldn't be charged, as he had a defence in law. The big difference with this case and Tony Martin is that the latter shot Fred Barras in the back as he tried to escape through a window and Brendan Fearon in the legs as he ran off. Don't get me wrong I have no sympathy for either of them as in my view once you commit crime your rights are out of the window.

Yep. @Mike D was just showing everyone that he didn’t know anything. Either that or trolling.

 

[Cheesy]

He's been told he wont face any more charges. By the Police. Who I would imagine know a damn sight more than you about the case.

Nobody knows more than Mike D on any subject. Surely you know that by now!

 

[SWP's back]

Nobody knows more than Mike D on any subject. Surely you know that by now!

But he’s yet to be right in a decade.....?