North Stand Expansion

Who's stumping up 1.5 billion to build a brand new 75 - 80 k stadium, the Glazers and scruffy Jim? Don't make me laugh. Theyre already in the hole for nearly a billion quid on shitty transfers and residual long term debt from the leveraged purchase. These kind of businesses don't fund their building projects with their own money, they borrow it, secured on the clubs collateral. I doubt they can raise that kind of capitol with their existing debt and even if they did their "mortgage" before existing operating costs would be a scary percentage of turnover.
Rest easy we won't have to tell them to "fuck off", it's not happening. Theyre just getting Bodget and Scarper in, the flat roof specialists to fix up the leaks and give the place a lick of paint.
 
Kinkys Left Foot said:
Who's stumping up 1.5 billion to build a brand new 75 - 80 k stadium, the Glazers and scruffy Jim? Don't make me laugh. Theyre already in the hole for nearly a billion quid on shitty transfers and residual long term debt from the leveraged purchase. These kind of businesses don't fund their building projects with their own money, they borrow it, secured on the clubs collateral. I doubt they can raise that kind of capitol with their existing debt and even if they did their "mortgage" before existing operating costs would be a scary percentage of turnover.
Rest easy we won't have to tell them to "fuck off", it's not happening. Theyre just getting Bodget and Scarper in, the flat roof specialists to fix up the leaks and give the place a lick of paint.
Click to expand...
Probably the same lenders that helped this motley crew out....if they can rebuild a shit hole of an old stadium , then the raggys will have no issue.
Camp Nou looks unrecognisable as iconic stadium in ruins amid rebuild | Sport | Independent TV
 
Allow the rags to develop a new stadium that would allow them to increase their match-day revenue to even greater heights by lending them the Etihad?

What do City get out of it? A few seasons of rent we don't really need the increased revenue on a temporary basis

Absolutely not, we shouldn't help them in any way shape or form they mocked us when we were down with their despicable manager's comments the club sanctioned banner which should never be forgiven, or forgotten, probably one that is without precedent, certainly in English football.

Then more seriously the orchestrated campaign to wreck City since Sheikh Mansour took over

Burnam can go to fuck, he's an arse, he should be sanctioned for the way he has used the office of the Mayor of Greater Manchester to campaign on behalf of something that has zero to do with Greater Manchester. His letters supporting Everton were embarrassing as well

Manchester City have exclusive rights to the stadium and a 250 year lease. Manchester City Council have no responsibility to the rags as they reside in Trafford Brough. Burnham has no power on this matter and Sport England also have no influence.

It would be City's decision the only other authority could possible be licensing.
 
Gordyola said:
Allow the rags to develop a new stadium that would allow them to increase their match-day revenue to even greater heights by lending them the Etihad?

What do City get out of it? A few seasons of rent we don't really need the increased revenue on a temporary basis

Absolutely not, we shouldn't help them in any way shape or form they mocked us when we were down with their despicable manager's comments the club sanctioned banner which should never be forgiven, or forgotten, probably one that is without precedent, certainly in English football.

Then more seriously the orchestrated campaign to wreck City since Sheikh Mansour took over

Burnam can go to fuck, he's an arse, he should be sanctioned for the way he has used the office of the Mayor of Greater Manchester to campaign on behalf of something that has zero to do with Greater Manchester. His letters supporting Everton were embarrassing as well

Manchester City have exclusive rights to the stadium and a 250 year lease. Manchester City Council have no responsibility to the rags as they reside in Trafford Brough. Burnham has no power on this matter and Sport England also have no influence.

It would be City's decision the only other authority could possible be licensing.
Click to expand...

Come on you know how we run our club at the top? They will allow it
 
Corky said:
Burnham has no powers in this area in reality, it is just political pressure like complaining to an MP over a local council.

I think it is all complete bollocks due to current stadium footprint not being big enough to add any seats, they would actually lose them if they built to decent size standards. Therefore knocking down and rebuilding the current one isn't likely. They won't want to relocate but that is the far more sensible option.

Neither side's fans would want it, and you will get all sorts of vandalism, plus even more arena clashes.
Click to expand...
I don’t get your comment about Stadium foot print and where would they relocate to ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.