Well having browsed around your job, the techies working on the software seem to think that your role will actually adapt into a dual programming/engineering role as you interpret data but your Operators are fucked.
Robots are more accurate than humans when it comes to dexterity already. Here's a robot stitching a grape
Community care is an interesting one actually. You'd think it couldn't be replaced but in fact it just wouldn't be replaced by a single machine, but many of them. One machine for getting in and out of bed, one machine to help dress, one machine to cook, driverless vehicle for hospital visits, etc. Early tests have suggested that people actually feel more comfortable talking to robots than they do humans and would tell them things they'd never tell another person - something a clinic in the US has used to its advantage in diagnosing chronic illnesses. Companionship is obviously different but that's not really a job but instead a feature of a job. We'd solve that problem in other ways.
Robot chefs already exist though they cheat a bit. It isn't actually a robot in the strictest sense with "cooking intelligence" - instead they have got a bunch of masterchefs to cook a meal in a certain space and have motion captured them which can then be replicated by the machine. Of course it has the visual acuity to see ingredients and the like of but it's not strictly cooking, though you get a nice meal at the end so it depends on your definition.
This won't replace chefs because the art is in the error so to speak, but cars didn't replace horses either they just moved them from a transport unit to something that enthusiasts/hobbyists persue. Same with automated cars, they're not going to replace driving, they're just going to make it something people do for fun rather than transport.
Here's the kitchen, they reckon it will be on sale in 2019.