I get what your saying, im not disagreeing with you, but I don't think its a case of him holding "all the cards", as he still has a contract
If he's out of contract then obviously he does
Arsenal will surely still have a say in where he goes - every club in Europe would want him
If arsenal play hardball and it gets messy, then he may have to go to his second choice team, its a gamble for them though
Who would you say is the more likely to be a City player come the start of the season?
theres a lad on here that defo itk,he even tells us his shirt number.The only ITK info I saw on here was when Delph signed for us. A guy posted info about his U-turn before any press or media reported it.
He never claimed to be ITK either. Just said he got the info from a mate and it was true.
People will get info about the odd deal but people who claim to know stuff about all our deals I just ignore. They just reiterate what they see in the papers and online. Some of these people do make the transfer forum interesting though and in the summer months im more than happy to play along :-)
Arsenal have got no say in where he goes. They either let him go where he wants, or he stinks the place out for a year having hissy fits and then leaves them £40m poorer.
They do though, if he has a contract
Its up to Sanchez if he holds out for another year, or goes on strike etc
Arsenal won't rollover on this one, no way
If your sanchez, and you have £300k on the table offer from us and paris for example, what do you do? hold out, cause problems etc to force a move? what if arsenal don't budge? does sanchez risk tarnishing his rep, or does he take the Paris move?
To say arsenal have no say, is simply wrong, although the player does have the advantage, I agree
What about Bonucci Tolm??Arsenal hold little leverage - they keep an unhappy player for another year and lose him for nothing.
Arsenal can't dictate the club because they would need to get cracking on his replacement.
Rather have Bappe than Sanchez
its barmcakeRather have Bappe than Sanchez