Most of these are just silly. Why do some people feel the need to constantly keep messing about with our beautiful game looking for ways to change it. Just let people enjoy it as they always have. Especially the one about not being able to score rebounds from penalties - what on earth is wrong with that?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
2 x 45 minute halves to be scrapped ??
- Thread starter oakiecokie
- Start date
Most of these are just silly. Why do some people feel the need to constantly keep messing about with our beautiful game looking for ways to change it. Just let people enjoy it as they always have. Especially the one about not being able to score rebounds from penalties - what on earth is wrong with that?
Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 37,004
I'd be in favour of this. Would favour attacking sides of which we are one.
Every season refs are given a number of rules to put more emphasis on enforcing,if they concentrated on time wasting at throw ins and goal kicks this would go a long way to sorting the problem.I think they often take a ridiculous amount of time. It takes an age for some of them to pick the ball up and, of course, give it a good clean. Then we have all that taking it too far up the line to steal some yards, being told to go back, ambling back and then pointing to where it should be taken. Then you have to wait as a series of players make routine runs before the thrower eventually gets the ball back in play. You can tell I'm not a fan.
Never understood the reason for them. Why not just allow players to put the ball on the line and kick it back into play?
The reason I would stop the clock on injuries is that no ref is keen on taking chances when a player goes to ground, even if he's sure the player is feigning injury, just in case he's wrong.
balotelli's back pocket
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 8,270
Keep it as it is, but sin bin for timewasting.
drthingy
Well-Known Member
Like it in principle, but wouldnt it just mean each throw in/free kick takes an age as the player waits until they are perfectly set up/had a breather?
Gabriel
Well-Known Member
Most of these are just silly. Why do some people feel the need to constantly keep messing about with our beautiful game looking for ways to change it. Just let people enjoy it as they always have. Especially the one about not being able to score rebounds from penalties - what on earth is wrong with that?
The rules of the game have constantly evolved. It used to be the case (maybe up to 1914 or 1920?) that the goalkeeper could run and bounce the ball up to the halfway line before kicking it into the opponent's half (unbelievable, I know).
Gabriel
Well-Known Member
Like it in principle, but wouldnt it just mean each throw in/free kick takes an age as the player waits until they are perfectly set up/had a breather?
Five seconds from putting the ball on the line to getting it into play. Over five seconds and the referee whistles and awards the kick the other way. :-)
prestonibbo_mcfc
Well-Known Member
They'll piss about with the game so much, it will soon will be unwatchable.
jimharri
Moderator
Weren't 45 minute halves scrapped at the Meccano Set years ago? Unless they're winning, of course.
but surly reducing a game to 30 min per half is benefitting the teams that time waste as this is the same amount of game time they are currently used too? or is that too hard for some people to understand? this will be a travesty if it happens.