Ok you have laid it out for me with sources to look for . The argument now makes a bit more sense. we are all brainwashed to a degree, and the media does that
The BBC are subtle with a centrist left angle(which is just centrist capitalism that promotes the 'peacefull way' of getting divearse and cheap labour- i mainly read politics fromall sources, fabien left, extreme left, left, centre, right, hard right from britain and different regions and natios within, france, german, russia, usa, china, spain and not just through google news as it can bring up filtered content), however they don't over verbalise, they don't report on anything until its fact checked. they dont go overboard on phrases which can end up meaning different things to different people. they don't utilize hyperbole, they don't produce fake news, they may right two sides to a story in opinion pieces. but they don't portray it as news as the daily mail might that write conflicting hyperbole that click baits both or all sides that are susceptible. The bbc are not standard left like the guardian or further left like the new statesman ir even further like sputnik(russian propaganda), or right like the mail or further right like brietbart or further right which is harder to find as much has been taken down but vpns and or tor will get you content.
I check out fox - christ that is supposedly a kind of normal thing in america - yes some laugh at it. but its every day life yet its so racist its beyond belief.
The bbc are not without fault however in many things (despite its political agenda) its as balanced with current affairs as can be - if something happens it just states details in the news with no bias or agenda, just facts only - no opinions. . Yes they may have opinion pieces like all media sources do- but people need to understand what that means. opinion pieces are clearly marked.
I would have assumed the BBC would have plenty of sports writers - some pro certain clubs and others not pro certain clubs, and the editors mis the omissions without caring as its not really that relevant.
TAKE NOTICE OF WHAT NEATRALS SAY ABOUT YOUR CLUBS play not the papers.. ok.
a link to a man city article full of praise and real journalistic integrity from Saj Chowdhury- a art of the article is added below the link
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/41534300
"Manchester City manager
Pep Guardiola suggested, inadvertently or otherwise, that title rivals Tottenham were a one-man teambecause of Harry Kane's goals this season. He has scored 13 of their 22 goals in all competitions this season."
no other media source would do that - they would just say pep called tottenham the harry kane team - or something similar - with no explanation of doubt as to how it was phrased \9english is not his first language)
However tparts of the BBC have been part of evil doings in the past and probably to this day as its a huge power structure and i do not forgive them for it - but the truth is you will find different angles on sports from different journos. and its the most strictly non partisan news source which is highly moderated before making public.
Yes that one journo you speak of may have a beef with City, and the editors publish his stuff. But its really not a big deal. There are much more worrying stuff going on in corruption in football and major corruption in the world to get wrapped up in that.