This thread is about the media. Therefore in that context i believe it is an important distinction because if its subconscious and the Network just gives more work to pundits that get the best ratings. its just the way of the world , its just about money not a conspiracy against City.
But you as a supporter don't see this perspective , unlike me that is an follower not a supporter). So I have to accept your view in good faith. But can you explain why.
In my opinion the Net result may be the same short term, but not long term.
I take it you would all love an ex Man city player as a regular pundit. who would you go with?
I can only think of paul dickov.