Ringo Starr

I don't get how he's so wealthy when it's Lennon and McCartney who wrote 95% of the songs.
If I remember correctly him and george harrison were allowed to write one song per album which for the success they achieved would have given them countless royalties. Much prefer zak as a drummer and man
 
If I ranked beatles using talent alone it would be,
McCartney
Harrison
Lennon
Starr

If I added likeability and whether I thought they weren't a twat combined with talent then it would be

Harrison - funded life of brian and seems to have been a decent person

Starr - Thomas the tank engine and replied to all his fan mail (took him decades though)

McCartney - drops points for linda mccartney vegetarian meals and tge fact he's been dead since the sixties and replaced by a poster on here

Lennon - Middle class tory pretending to be a common man, battered his first wife and generally annoying in the 70's

So Ringo getting one is fair enough as he wasn't the worst Beatle overall.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.