M
M
Thats it maybe bravo is of to the rags and sanchez was informed.whilst i am disappointed we did not get him i think this deal is great for city , those wages will have every player knocking on Maureens door, and a lot of envious players at utd , but it does effect us as well, what happens to Bravo? did we buy him with the intention of luring Sanchez, there is little doubt he is Peps worst buy taking up a Foreign spot in a place we do not need and we already have a good player in Gunn ready, Am i being spiteful?
I predicted the disaster that Bravo is, I also know he is far better than he showed last season but not as good as Gunn, my point was shoud we keep a Sanchez`s Friend at city especially as we do not need him?If you have concerns re Bravo watch 1st goal v WBA in Car Cup.........that's why Pep bought him! Sadly he has lapses when under the sort of pressure he never came under at Barca or with Chile.....the gamble didn't pay off so we now have Ederson
Are you wumming?
The rags played their cards better? How? By about 250k a week more?
You don't bring nothing to the table pal, why you on bluemoon?