City_Sean
Well-Known Member
Of course it is. He deliberately stamps on the player whilst he’s on the ground. If that happened to any of our lads we’d be livid and rightly so.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Of course it is. He deliberately stamps on the player whilst he’s on the ground. If that happened to any of our lads we’d be livid and rightly so.
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 26,159
Both Silva and Fernandinho were booked, so they'd have to apply different rules to City for that to happen.Bollocks all day long, even the commentator sugested he had no where to put his leg, he didnt stamp on him. Blues are weird, we start off complaining about a waist high, studs up challange and end up wanting one of our own retrospectively banned. YCNMIU.
Oh...
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 26,159
Not sure it was 100% deliberate, but If Fern had been sent off and the ref applied the same rules to our opponents (big "if" I know), then last nights game would have been abandoned with WBA being down to 6 players.Of course it is. He deliberately stamps on the player whilst he’s on the ground. If that happened to any of our lads we’d be livid and rightly so.
City_Sean
Well-Known Member
Both Silva and Fernandinho were booked, so they'd have to apply different rules to City for that to happen.
Oh...
Was Fernandinho booked for his stamp on Krychowiak? If not then he can certainly be banned.
On MOTD, it looked strange. It didn't look entirely convincing that he had nowhere else to put it down, and that there was a fraction of a second's pause before he did put it down. It wasn't done with a great deal of force, but anything like that has been grouped under 'stamp' for sensationalism for a year or two now.
MoTD did him a favour by not showing the other angle. It's pretty blatant. I wouldn't say it's a stamp but he definitely trod on him and could easily have been a red.
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 26,159
I thought he was booked but the ref had a chat with him - so he clearly saw it.Was Fernandinho booked for his stamp on Krychowiak? If not then he can certainly be banned.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 9,373
Of course it is. He deliberately stamps on the player whilst he’s on the ground. If that happened to any of our lads we’d be livid and rightly so.
FWIW, I thought at the time that their legs tangled when Fernandinho was stepping over him, and he trod on him after losing a little balance. May be wrong, haven't seen it again since the match.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Never a stamp. Looked more like he trod on him by mistake. Just clumsy with no intent and not enough to cause any injury. With today's lightweight boots it wouldn't even have hurt that much. To compare this with the two-footed lunge by MClean on KDB and the appalling two-footed assault on Diaz is laughable. There is no equivalence here. The worst I have ever seen from a City player was the attack by Ben Thatcher which should have been a police matter in my view.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
MoTD did him a favour by not showing the other angle. It's pretty blatant. I wouldn't say it's a stamp but he definitely trod on him and could easily have been a red.
Yes, that's what I thought.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.