Sorry, I’ve just got in so not caught up on the thread, but what’s everyone’s opinion on the goalkeeping situation - should we be playing Bravo as he’s the cup keeper or Ederson because he’s better?
Sorry, I’ve just got in so not caught up on the thread, but what’s everyone’s opinion on the goalkeeping situation - should we be playing Bravo as he’s the cup keeper or Ederson because he’s better?
Dunno, your the first to raise it :)
if a few of them fuck up we can moan about the team,if as with the bristol away game we ship 2 goals and are a minute from extra time then bravo would get the shit if kev hadn't of bailed him out with a last minute goal,instead of your silly mind games lets wait and see what happens
Sorry, I’ve just got in so not caught up on the thread, but what’s everyone’s opinion on the goalkeeping situation - should we be playing Bravo as he’s the cup keeper or Ederson because he’s better?
Brilliant :)To be honest it's a bit annoying. When you've made the leap to join "Club City" as I and many others did in 2008, you did it for one reason and one reason only - trophies. So when the manager chooses the 2nd string goalie he's reducing our chances of us enjoying a bit more reflected glory, which is testing our loyalty - and that's not right.
Well after making the leap to join 'club city' in 1982, you'll understand when I say "I couldn't care less who starts in nets', because we are in a final, so whoever plays will get my full support.To be honest it's a bit annoying. When you've made the leap to join "Club City" as I and many others did in 2008, you did it for one reason and one reason only - trophies. So when the manager chooses the 2nd string goalie he's reducing our chances of us enjoying a bit more reflected glory, which is testing our loyalty - and that's not right.
Pantilimon in goal against Sunderland,and Caballero,not Bravo,against liverpool.... how much I hope, I ll be wrong bout Bravo,on Sunday afternoonLast two League Cup wins saw Pantilimon and Caballero in goal.