Search results

Apologies for mentioning the unthinkable, but if for some rather strange reason, (ranging from dodgy referee decision / var, red card, deflected goal etc) who would you "rather" lose to Coventry (not happy, but could live with it, (particularly if reason was one of the above, as opposed to poor...

Coventry say "excuse me, we ain't even played yet!" Let's hope the whole of Wembley turns Sky Blue!!!

All from the same e-Mail

Any chance of a refund, I could do with my 2 hours back as well.

The twats are useless, just now “ Calvert Lewis 21 goals since he last scored”

united do WANT to retain the FA Cup, however, to retain it, they have to win it first!

Just re-wound to to check I hadn’t missheard it. “United facing there biggest match of the season next week against Liverpool at Old Toilet, where they will try to retain the trophy “ !!!!! They really can’t help themselves

You had to be quick, sold out in under 3 minutes

Totally agree with you, the only problem is, had it been 1 - 1, i suggest to you, there would have been no more than 3 minutes added on. AND...............yes i'm serious

They are supposed to add the exact time lost, from goal being scored until play re-starting. 8 minutes was fair enough really, its just you can absolutely guarantee, if the score was still 1 - 1, the most we'd have got was 3 or 4

Unfortunately, this divergence is going to be very brief !

In case i did, can i please mention Peter Walton!

Very difficult to choose the worst, did i mention Peter Walton ? Worst as in incompetent ? biased ? bent cheat? did i mention Peter Walton? There really are so many to consider, did i mention Peter Walton?, Seriously, there are many absolute shite referees, most of whom have been named...

Add bookmark #22,563 He might have done, but the f***ing dipper on second, went through all the usual "libelous" crap. Can't fill their stadium, biggest revenues in football can't be right, its a joke . fiddled treble......... Why the f**k, did they even put him on, they'd asked City fans if...

He might have done, but the f***ing dipper on second, went through all the usual "libelous" crap. Can't fill their stadium, biggest revenues in football can't be right, its a joke . fiddled treble......... Why the f**k, did they even put him on, they'd asked City fans if they were worried about...

And so he should bent / useless f*cker

Nothing wrong with suggesting it, that's your opinion, my opinion is your suggestion is utter nonsense !

you sure know how to go out of your way to upset people. I'm sure, its your opinion, and you are entitled to it, but jeez !!

Before VAR, we were always at the mercy of the referee / linesman, and still are to a degree. The clear and obvious edict "prevents" them from intervening for ordinary decisions, so why is Offside any different? Clear and obvious offside = OFFSIDE Clear and obvious onside = ONSIDE Not clear and...

Sorry, you are missing the point of my post, If it's not CLEARLY offside, then it's ONSIDE, i don't want it to be "more accurate". I simply don't want marginal offsides, marginal is onside, (benefit to the attacker? what on earth happened to that directive?) notwithstanding that it is so...