£40m for RSC

Re: £40m for RSC

I hate him too - but that's not what he said. He said he's not looking to sell because if they get relegated it will cost them forty million quid, and if he paid what RSC's market value is, there's no-one he could buy that quick who'd replace RSC... but if he were offered forty million quid he would probably have to take it. We can't get so wrapped up in little sound bites without listening to the context. The media is trying to distort everything to create heroes and villains.
 
Re: £40m for RSC

Jack-Nicholson-Photograph-C12148072.jpeg
 
Re: £40m for RSC

Not his first choice striker at the moment so he's hardly the difference between them going down and staying up is he?

And is BFS not confident of his sublime abilities as a manager all of a sudden? Surely the flowing football he will have them playing will launch them up the league.
 
Re: £40m for RSC

Its easy to think that just because a team has money that they automatically deserve respect and that teams should buckle under the pressure to just sell their best players to them.

Thats not the real world.

In the end, if City want Cruz, they have to pay the price on his head. There is a premium in January regardless of which club it is, Santa Cruz has a 4 year contract, he will be hard to replace, City and Rovers are rivals in the league.

Big Sam is doing the right thing in pricing City out of the deal, so to speak. They dont need to sell and if Man City want him, they should PAY?

The insults at Sam for doing what is sensible and reasonable for HIS club are just ridiculous. Its a childish response to not getting your own way.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.