Adolf Hitler's Paintings

[PinkFinal]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/d...-adolf-hitler-features-in-new-art-exhibition/

Is that really so bad or is it being judged negatively because of who the creator was? Just because you like some of Gary Glitter's music or Roman Polanski's films doesn't mean you like them as people. Particularly as I personally would not have lasted long under Hitler. I'd say this was pretentious or mediocre rather than 'shit'. I've seen some of his other stuff and it ranges from poor to quite good, for an amateur.

 

[Leto]

They're not shit but they are nothing special at all, that's why he never made it.

 

[Xiphos]

Some of his paintings but more so his sketches from WW1 have been judged as decent

 

[calum down]

 

[jazzy]

Better than a some so called great artists but distinctly unimpressive. Maybe if you had put a name like Damien Hirst on it all the art world experts would be raving over it. Calling it dark and post negative realism or some other bullshit

 

[denislawsbackheel]

He was shit.
So shit he couldn't get into art college.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

He was shit.
So shit he couldn't get into art college.

I could paint better stuff with the brush stickin' outta me arse!

 

[yeseye]

I could paint better stuff with the brush stickin' outta me arse!

Maybe he used your method!

 

[Xiphos]

He was shit.
So shit he couldn't get into art college.

Aye he was that shit some of his paintings sold for 400,000 Euros at auction in Germany, not bad for a homicidal nutcase, wonder where the money went?

 

[BlueMoonRisin’]

I could paint better stuff with the brush stickin' outta me arse!

I was looking at porn ont tinternet a while back(like you do) and a good looking chic was squirting watercolours out of her arse hole onto a big canvas. Bizzarre really.