Alexis Sanchez

Status
Not open for further replies.
Goal per minute, Kelechi has the best ratio.

Swerved the question - you know I was referring to the suggestion that Kun should be swapped for Sanchez. Agree with a previous poster - wouldn't swap Kun for anyone
 
Sanch
Swerved the question - you know I was referring to the suggestion that Kun should be swapped for Sanchez. Agree with a previous poster - wouldn't swap Kun for anyone

It's a crazy idea people even thinking it mate Sanchez is not a 25 goal a season man like Aguero we'd certainly be going backwards.

Different type of player.
 
I think if we did that then there'd be a bigger shit storm than getting rid of Hart.
Both decisions for the betterment of the team

Aguero hasn't been the same for 18 months , he has always had his best periods playing in a two

It's no coincidence that his form dipped when Pelegríni dropped his 442 around the same time. He was even in a two with Forlan at athletico

Great player obviously and a city legend but i think the times right to go our separate ways
 
Last edited:
they did with Hart yet people still bleat on about it.
People will bleat, but it is all about results in the end. At least for some of us. If it improves our performance, then it would have been worth it.

If you look at the Front 3 without Aguero yesterday. You could easily see why Sanchez will be a better fit. 3 players that can move all across the front 3 easily. Sanchez is more like that than Aguero is.

And while Sanchez might score less, if the team overall scores more then it would have been the right decision.

Funny enough, as Bad as Bravo has been, (mostly with luck) we've conceeded 2 think 2 more goals than before, but about 20 less shots on target.

So really for Bravo to end up a net positive for City, a 10℅ increase in saves will blow Joe's conceeded record out of the water.

Folks would still whine about how he is no great shakes, but we'd have conceded fewer shots and goals and this likely win more.

Or at least, that's the theory.
 
People will bleat, but it is all about results in the end. At least for some of us. If it improves our performance, then it would have been worth it.

If you look at the Front 3 without Aguero yesterday. You could easily see why Sanchez will be a better fit. 3 players that can move all across the front 3 easily. Sanchez is more like that than Aguero is.

And while Sanchez might score less, if the team overall scores more then it would have been the right decision.

Funny enough, as Bad as Bravo has been, (mostly with luck) we've conceeded 2 think 2 more goals than before, but about 20 less shots on target.

So really for Bravo to end up a net positive for City, a 10℅ increase in saves will blow Joe's conceeded record out of the water.

Folks would still whine about how he is no great shakes, but we'd have conceded fewer shots and goals and this likely win more.

Or at least, that's the theory.

just needs to save a couple.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.