the biggest decscion of the match was walcott on ferdandiho and he did't
even give a foul. Says it all
I was watching on Spanish TV and it looked well over the ball but we didn't get a reply, I presume it was as bad as I thought.
the biggest decscion of the match was walcott on ferdandiho and he did't
even give a foul. Says it all
Sorry, but we shouldn't be needing the ref for us to beat a woeful Arsenal side who were there for the taking. Maybe if the players worked as hard during a game as they do complaining about officials, we might have won the game by half time.
You were right.I was watching on Spanish TV and it looked well over the ball but we didn't get a reply, I presume it was as bad as I thought.
In return for access to PGMOL to make the programme with Neville & Carragher, it's quite clear that Sky have adopted a hear-no-evil, see-no-evil, speak-no-evil policy.It's almost like Sky are deliberately trying to hide the corruption. Can't imagine why....
There has been the shadow of TV influence (mainly Sky) over match officials for a number of years now.In return for access to PGMOL to make the programme with Neville & Carragher, it's quite clear that Sky have adopted a hear-no-evil, see-no-evil, speak-no-evil policy.
But why does anyone expect anything different from the organisation that's had refs dancing to their tune for a while. I'm in no doubt that Howard Webb's strings were being pulled by Sky and that's how he was our 'number 1 ref' despite being no better than others.
I know for a fact that Sky tell the refs about bad decisions at half-time. They only have to be selective about it to influence a game. ****s.There has been the shadow of TV influence (mainly Sky) over match officials for a number of years now.