Which is more prestigious - Player's Player of the Season, or the Sports Writers award?
From recent comments on TV and radio, it sounds like most players can't be bothered voting, and their PFA rep fills out their forms. Those who do complete them properly can be biased against certain players or clubs.
On the other hand, the sports writers watch football for a living. They see all players and all teams, and they are more likely to be objective in their voting. I think theirs is the better award.
For me, Bale had a great start to the season, and apart from one outstanding game in the Champions League has otherwise been average. Even Spurs fans say Modric has had a better season.
I agree with the sports writers that Parker has been consistently good this season. He would be followed by Vincent Kompany and Vidic in my top three.
From recent comments on TV and radio, it sounds like most players can't be bothered voting, and their PFA rep fills out their forms. Those who do complete them properly can be biased against certain players or clubs.
On the other hand, the sports writers watch football for a living. They see all players and all teams, and they are more likely to be objective in their voting. I think theirs is the better award.
For me, Bale had a great start to the season, and apart from one outstanding game in the Champions League has otherwise been average. Even Spurs fans say Modric has had a better season.
I agree with the sports writers that Parker has been consistently good this season. He would be followed by Vincent Kompany and Vidic in my top three.