Chelsea Lad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 157
Yes, the 1938/9 season. However, this was before football began in 1992 so doesn't count.
Haha yeah good point ;-)
Yes, the 1938/9 season. However, this was before football began in 1992 so doesn't count.
Thats true & we do need a big clear out & rebuild next summer, hopefully some of our kids will finally be given a chance(cant see it though sadly)
Is it 'downing tools' or are the players burnt out from last season? The players looked shagged out to me.
To be fair, thay have had large slices of bad luck this season, whereas the season before, they had a disproportionate amount of good fortune.
Many people have referred to Mourihno's mental toughness . However, this has been shown to be folly. He's got the resilience of a spoilt child.
1937/8.Yes, the 1938/9 season. However, this was before football began in 1992 so doesn't count.
Of course: 36/37, followed by 67/68.1937/8.
Chelsea announce £23.1m loss but deny they are struggling with FFP rules
http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...y-are-struggling-with-ffp-rules-a3121361.html
They bloody well are if they keep that up :)
Edit: by the sound of that article they're going to be reliant on making top 4 this season to pass the monitoring period ending next season, unless they can write off a huge amount of costs.