remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Put them all on piece-work, that'll sort the problem out, simple !!!
If they're both 25, its hard to see how either could have been there "10 years longer", but if so then City should probably be done for employing child labour.He may have been there 10 years longer (or vice versa).
I think the report refers to them as casual and are not entitled to bonus payments. I ain't going back to check though ;)Gender Pay Gap doesnt take into account part time workers.
If they're both 25, its hard to see how either could have been there "10 years longer", but if so then City should probably be done for employing child labour.
Why not? He might serve 20 tickets an hour to her 10 (or vice versa). He may have been there 10 years longer (or vice versa).
I fail to see where tenure, experience and performance are reviewed as part of the gender pay gap debate. That’s not to mention many other variables.