deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Can someone explain how a photo taken over 2 years ago is relevant for the mail to have an article in their paper today or yesterday just don't get it..
They're bottom feeding scum.Can someone explain how a photo taken over 2 years ago is relevant for the mail to have an article in their paper today or yesterday just don't get it..
God knows how many photos of celebrities they have put in their papers,and I would say a majority similar to sterlings taken a number of years ago,sometimes just to fill column inches other times for mischief making..They're bottom feeding scum.
I refer you to my previous post.God knows how many photos of celebrities they have put in their papers,and I would say a majority similar to sterlings taken a number of years ago,sometimes just to fill column inches other times for mischief making..
To think it's the 2nd biggest selling print paper and the worlds most visited website. :/
its a continental cost circa £150 to triple the base price of the car with modifications would be something elseIt's been modified, I believe.
Pictures!And I would love to bathe and annoint the size 7's of Kate Winslet every day of the week. Twice at the weekend.
Sadly, and I haven't used the Mail online in over two years, I believe that's probably because they fill their home page with scantily dressed teenage girls. Scum.The picture was from 2 years ago and taken in Southport.
The Mail are yet again completely lying. How anyone reads that paper/site I don't know.
To think it's the 2nd biggest selling print paper and the worlds most visited website. :/
They're bottom feeding scum.