SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,250
Reported.Having read his last few posts, I haven't a clue.
Maybe I'm a neo-classical liberalist democratic fascist?
Reported.Having read his last few posts, I haven't a clue.
Maybe I'm a neo-classical liberalist democratic fascist?
That’s a very personal question. I wouldnt mind answering . But I just want to check, so you're ok with those who oppose same sex marriage then?So you’re ok with same sex marriage and the like then?
What do you mean ‘am I ok with those that oppose same sex marriage”?That’s a very personal question. I wouldnt mind answering . But I just want to check, so you're ok with those who oppose same sex marriage then?
That's about the same percentage as Trump's core support.Was watching a programme the other night on Americans views on same sex marriage. Only 20 years ago nearly 75% were against it & now it's down to abt 35%. Still amazing to think though that there's still that many backward redneck Cvnts across the pond.
In the freedom of their own religion , say Islam for example , you're not for freedom within its own teachings ,to oppose same sex marriage ?What do you mean ‘am I ok with those that oppose same sex marriage”?
No of course I’m bloody not ok with them.
I’m not ok with anyone that believes they should have a say in how anyone else lives their lives with other consenting adults.
I’m not ok with racists either.
Are you?
Was watching a programme the other night on Americans views on same sex marriage. Only 20 years ago nearly 75% were against it & now it's down to abt 35%. Still amazing to think though that there's still that many backward redneck Cvnts across the pond.
In the freedom of their own religion , say Islam for example , you're not for freedom within its own teachings ,to oppose same sex marriage ?
I wonder in the Venn Diagram of Trump’s support and the number still opposed to it how many circles you’d be able to see.
If people wish to believe the teachings of a book written by a sheep hearder 1,700 years ago*, much of which, since being proven to be bollocks by science and now is taken as allegorical then that’s fine and good luck to them. If they want to interfere with the lives of other consenting adults then fuck them.
I’d also like to conduct a check and ensure that all of those in the Bible Belt opposed to same sex marriage also don’t eat shell fish or pork seeing as Leviticus also outlaws that along with the gay sex. I’d hate for them to end up in hell due to the prawn cocktail after they’d spent their lives trying to curtail the rights of homosexuals. Almost wouldn’t seem fair now would it.
You see I’m libertarian if anything. I don’t believe that anyone should try and stop any other humans from doing things to or with any other consenting human. So if people want to be religious, great. If they want to partake in a 17 man only orgy, super. If they want to stop people going to church or outlaw it, fuck them and so on and so forth.
*we all know it was written by several and the edited and re-edited a couple of centuries after the events it describes.
Was it not Deuteronomy?I’d also like to conduct a check and ensure that all of those in the Bible Belt opposed to same sex marriage also don’t eat shell fish or pork seeing as Leviticus also outlaws that along with the gay sex. I’d hate for them to end up in hell due to the prawn cocktail after they’d spent their lives trying to curtail the rights of homosexuals. Almost wouldn’t seem fair now would it.
I’d also like to conduct a check and ensure that all of those in the Bible Belt opposed to same sex marriage also don’t eat shell fish or pork seeing as Leviticus also outlaws that along with the gay sex. I’d hate for them to end up in hell due to the prawn cocktail after they’d spent their lives trying to curtail the rights of homosexuals. Almost wouldn’t seem fair now would it.