GornikDaze
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 8,632
Lets hope Pogbad doesn't get an immediate game ban... top 4 and the EL could be back on :(
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
FIFA to investigate Pogba transfer
- Thread starter SPIDERBOY
- Start date
morleyswife
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 2,700
Sure this a technicality but I believe they are looking at 3rd party ownership as agent recieved nearly half of transfer fee
City_Sean
Well-Known Member
Lets hope Pogbad doesn't get an immediate game ban... top 4 and the EL could be back on :(
I think its mostly about Raiola.
CharliesRightPeg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 589
Just read something saying third party ownership due to the agent getting 50% of any deal over a certain £.Sure this a technicality but I believe they are looking at 3rd party ownership as agent recieved nearly half of transfer fee
Pretty sure the times interview last year highlighted this, and if so it's fifa being super slow again
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
WTF's going on? Nobody has the right to challenge MUFC's integrity or business acuity. Heads will roll.
calum down
Well-Known Member
a corrupt organisation investigating 2 corrupt clubs and a corrupt agent.
nothing will come of this, as sure as night follows day.
that said,
the rags paid juventus £89m for the player.
juventus paid raiola roughly £20m for the image rights (or whatever it was that he owned)
so that they could sell the player, in full, to the rags.
the rags paid raiola roughly £21m because they are mugs.
not sure whether any of that could be deemed wrong or illegal.
that's my take on it, anyhow.
nothing will come of this, as sure as night follows day.
that said,
the rags paid juventus £89m for the player.
juventus paid raiola roughly £20m for the image rights (or whatever it was that he owned)
so that they could sell the player, in full, to the rags.
the rags paid raiola roughly £21m because they are mugs.
not sure whether any of that could be deemed wrong or illegal.
that's my take on it, anyhow.
Last edited:
City Raider
Well-Known Member
Lol i know. I love a conspiracy theory so how about us being behind the information leak in response to Gill inspired continued attacks on us eg academy.
Regardless, most interesting thing about all of this is where has the info come from? Someone has enemies.
aguerrrroooooooooooo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Feb 2016
- Messages
- 11,040
£41 million? Sounds like nonesense to me
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 26,112
Very probably. It won't be long before Fifa are declared a racketeering operation.Nothing will happen it's probably just a smoke screen for this;- http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39865344
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 26,112
Let's hope Raiola paid all the tax liabilities on those image rights..