Fox Sake Fake News.

[m7mcfc]

Watching fox news is like listening to talk sport, you sort of deserve what you get for being daft enough to tune in.

This^^^
I actually listen to and watch these channels as well as a few others to see how long it takes for me to want to punch whoever is talking.

 

[Bigga]

Probably the most disappointed I've ever been in a reply on here. I actually tried to start what I think is a reasonable discussion in a balanced and objective way and the first response is just to call me a racist.

Oh you!

 

[blueparrot]

Probably the most disappointed I've ever been in a reply on here. I actually tried to start what I think is a reasonable discussion in a balanced and objective way and the first response is just to call me a racist.

Perfect example of getting information from different places and putting them together to create a made up fact. Don't work for Fox do you?

 

[@BluePhil8]

@BluePhil8, you should look up Tomi Lahren.

She's right up your street...

Well I thought the ellipses made it clear you were implying something, if not I apologise.

Please explain why she would be up my street and I'll look her up tonight.

 

[Bigga]

Well I thought the ellipses made it clear you were implying something, if not I apologise.

Please explain why she would be up my street and I'll look her up tonight.

Even better, when you've watched her, you tell me what you disagree on...

 

[@BluePhil8]

Even better, when you've watched her, you tell me what you disagree on...

I insist mate, you thought I'd like her, it's only polite to tell me why. If you can't, that's fine.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Frankly anyone relying on any news station or paper for impartial media is an idiot.

This sums up the quality of 'news' on offer, whether it's from the RDAHMeedya or the BBC! They have a 'news' agenda which they will attempt to shove down people's throats.

 

[blueparrot]

This sums up the quality of 'news' on offer, whether it's from the RDAHMeedya or the BBC! They have a 'news' agenda which they will attempt to shove down people's throats.

True but there is a big difference between taking verifiable information or facts and spinning them to suit a view or agenda and using 'sources' unchecked or unreliable to make up a story to scare people into voting for your agenda.

 

[Bigga]

I insist mate, you thought I'd like her, it's only polite to tell me why. If you can't, that's fine.

Because it seems to ME, you have similar view points. I don't have to get into the weeds on it because I only know bits of your internet personality. That's how you've laid yourself out on previous occasions on the DT thread.

All you have to do is watch her and call her out on things you disagree with and I will know where you stand, generally speaking.

 

[mat]

True but there is a big difference between taking verifiable information or facts and spinning them to suit a view or agenda and using 'sources' unchecked or unreliable to make up a story to scare people into voting for your agenda.

That seems to be CNN's editorial at the moment.

Faux are pro republican and CNN pro dem it's so blatantly obvious and probably has something to do with the competition of both owners too.