I have a mechanical problem with a car that is going to have to be fixed. The fix is going to cost over £1300.00 - not that that is an issue at this stage. However the principle behind it is an issue to me.
We have a VW Golf Match MK6 1.6 TDI and yes it is caught up in the VW Diesel emissions scandal.
The problem we have is that the Exhaust Gas Recycling (EGR) valve is knackered, kaput, broken, not working and its worth noting this is a very common fault with cars of this year. The part alone will cost £390 plus six hours labour due to where this item is located - at the back and bottom of the engine.
Now the function of the EGR is to recycle the exhaust gasses, or emissions - it basically filters the Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) from the exhaust emissions - to prepare the gas to be re-injected back into the engine to increase efficiency and performance of the engine based on temperature and mix. So I understand this so far.
Now VW have declared that they have knowingly and deliberately misled people into buying these cars because the exhaust emissions are up to forty times greater than the test results actually show. This because the test apparatus are identified by software in the car which in turn produces a level of emission which is not true in the real world driving circumstances - clever huh?
My basic mind tells that this EGR valve now has to, in fact, work up to forty times harder to clean the emissions that are actually produced from the engine to recycle them back into the combustion process, therefore it is reasonable to assume that working forty times harder it is likely to fail sooner than would be reasonably be expected if the circumstances were what Volkswagen declared them to be. That in turn is a pretty good reason to assume that is why the EGR valve has failed.
My problem is not that VW are denying this, after all they've all been fed the party line and i would expect nothing else. The problem I have is how come some small independent garages are also saying the same thing? What they're saying is "its not related". I just cannot fathom it out.
Using my best logic I just cannot see how this denial can be made.... any thoughts anyone?
We have a VW Golf Match MK6 1.6 TDI and yes it is caught up in the VW Diesel emissions scandal.
The problem we have is that the Exhaust Gas Recycling (EGR) valve is knackered, kaput, broken, not working and its worth noting this is a very common fault with cars of this year. The part alone will cost £390 plus six hours labour due to where this item is located - at the back and bottom of the engine.
Now the function of the EGR is to recycle the exhaust gasses, or emissions - it basically filters the Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) from the exhaust emissions - to prepare the gas to be re-injected back into the engine to increase efficiency and performance of the engine based on temperature and mix. So I understand this so far.
Now VW have declared that they have knowingly and deliberately misled people into buying these cars because the exhaust emissions are up to forty times greater than the test results actually show. This because the test apparatus are identified by software in the car which in turn produces a level of emission which is not true in the real world driving circumstances - clever huh?
My basic mind tells that this EGR valve now has to, in fact, work up to forty times harder to clean the emissions that are actually produced from the engine to recycle them back into the combustion process, therefore it is reasonable to assume that working forty times harder it is likely to fail sooner than would be reasonably be expected if the circumstances were what Volkswagen declared them to be. That in turn is a pretty good reason to assume that is why the EGR valve has failed.
My problem is not that VW are denying this, after all they've all been fed the party line and i would expect nothing else. The problem I have is how come some small independent garages are also saying the same thing? What they're saying is "its not related". I just cannot fathom it out.
Using my best logic I just cannot see how this denial can be made.... any thoughts anyone?
Last edited: