BillyShears
Well-Known Member
I agree and not withstanding your Liverpool info, I see City and Barkley being right time, right place, for each other.
Especially so, if you consider Pep having previously explored the Wilshere option?
Barkley doesn't need to uproot and has plenty going for him at his age. Could see wanting to impress under Pep.
We were being quoted £50m just 18 months ago.
My worry with Ross is that I think he really needs to keep playing under a good coach. I'd hate to see him come to City and do a Delph where two years in we find the manager doesn't rate him and he's barely kicked a ball.
If Pep is ready to take him on as a project ala Sterling/Stones then I'm all in to do it. Would prefer it in fact to Dahoud or Isco simply on nationality. Pep's such a good coach I believe he can elevate attacking players in particular so I don't see any reason why Barkley couldn't progress to a level that would make him good enough to play for us in the long term with Pep in his ear.
On the pod the other day I figured we will be down to 17 first team players once everyone is sold/released/loaned and we will be looking at an incoming of 8 into the first team. We may get one or two from the EDS but mainly I reckon that'll be purchases.
Biggest summer since takeover in terms of actual number of players and spending?