Man city lose appeal against Fernandinho red

It was a pleasure to watch the refereeing performance last night. The fact that I can say that demonstrates how bad its been this season.

Yeah, him giving Kane offside from a throw in, was a season high point for them....
 
the irony West Ham player is sent off against Rags after 15 minutes and they are gifted the game , West Ham player wins appeal and can now play full 90 minutes against us. Perhaps a fairer way would be to take Stan Laurel off in the Rags next game in the 15th minute and punish the ugly c*nt for has award winning treble roll and scream like a girl manouvre , if their were oscars given out for cheats Stan laurel (the guy who hit every branch of the ugly tree when he fell out of it) , would win hands down , Rag tw*t
 
Cricket and rugby reviews are fact based, whereas what is and isn't a foul and handball particularly is subjective.

Rugby for example looks to see if the ball is grounded or out of play, and whether a player is onside. All of those are quite simple with TV providing yes/no answers. Cricket also provides yes/no on whether something is hit, and the predictive ball path; it's still quite poor on judging if a ball has carried to a diving fielder as the angles are often quite unclear.

Football Offsides on review should pick up clear offsides, but when players are in motion, it wouldn't show it for certain and we'd have to accept that.

Thats the main issue, what one referee considers a foul another might not and it can mostly depend ontheir positioning.

TV refs will never be a 100% perfect (Cricket and both Rugby codes aren't) but it should reduce the amount of errors/inconsistencies by being a back up for when a ref is unsure/unsighted or being able to interject when something needs to be addressed that was missed or in the case(s) of Rojo advising it's a red card offence.
 
the irony West Ham player is sent off against Rags after 15 minutes and they are gifted the game , West Ham player wins appeal and can now play full 90 minutes against us. Perhaps a fairer way would be to take Stan Laurel off in the Rags next game in the 15th minute and punish the ugly c*nt for has award winning treble roll and scream like a girl manouvre , if their were oscars given out for cheats Stan laurel (the guy who hit every branch of the ugly tree when he fell out of it) , would win hands down , Rag tw*t
The irony being he'll probably score against us as well (although not saying his ban should have stood) and agree about jones he should face a three match ban instead..
 
Thats the main issue, what one referee considers a foul another might not and it can mostly depend ontheir positioning.

TV refs will never be a 100% perfect (Cricket and both Rugby codes aren't) but it should reduce the amount of errors/inconsistencies by being a back up for when a ref is unsure/unsighted or being able to interject when something needs to be addressed that was missed or in the case(s) of Rojo advising it's a red card offence.

Pretty much my thoughts, possibly with the challenge flag idea (with reservations on when it can be used, to prevent tactical use of it).

It will also be very easy to see which challenges are successful/unsuccessful, and which of those decisions are iffy, thus judging how well it is working.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.