Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
*Removed the picture, forgot the rule*
Supposedly positive article, but can't help but think they've turned a cheeky tweet into a little dig.

'So when the £49m star potted a picture on instagram...' - So are we taking it as gospel that Raheem is £49m even though theres no chance those £5m in add ons have been met yet...

Anyway it was a great little tweet from Raheem, feck em.
I`ve also removed mine mate.
 
@oakiecokie you're right completely slipped my mind, you might need to unquote me in that last post so it doesn't show.

EDIT: Beat me to it, cheers pal.
 
Sterling was £49 million, mate.

Made this point to a rag the other day, but it's no surprise that the rag's scattergun purchase of some unheard of French kid for half a billion yen is never quoted with the add ons included like all our signings are by default.

There's no greater evidence of a media bias than that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.