Lancet Fluke
Well-Known Member
I can't believe anyone thinks stats are much use without context.
True, but for you to be write a text you have to be able to write it first. You cannot be good in the air if you don't win your duels.Just because I can write a lot of words doesn't mean that the text has any merit. It's a measure of quantity and not quality.
True, but for you to be write a text you have to be able to write it first. You cannot be good in the air if you don't win your duels.
Yes, trueTrue, but for you to be write a text you have to be able to write it first. You cannot be good in the air if you don't win your duels.
I remember half way through one season when Michael Ricketts was the leading goal scorer, he was shit ( by premiership footballing standards).For example if someone has scored 20 goals this season, its hard to conclude he is a "shit striker." Sure you can find people who have scored 27 or 28. And you can conclude those are better. But this will only show how hard it is to find those who have scored more.
Lol. You got me there. But he only scored :pI remember half way through one season when Michael Ricketts was the leading goal scorer, he was shit ( by premiership footballing standards).
No one does. What they in fact do is give more credence to an opinion those stats agree with.I can't believe anyone thinks stats are much use without context.
That's ok then, bear it in mind next time you try and blind us with stats. Can't be arsed reading the rest tbh.No one does.
LolThat's ok then, bear it in mind next time you try and blind us with stats. Can't be arsed reading the rest tbh.