ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 5,784
No way Kelechi is better. He's played 127 minutes of PL football in his whole life.
Martial? Really? He hasn't scored a goal in the PL since September and has been absolutely terrible in the CL. In the last four CL games he has attempted 36 take ons. He has completed only 5 of them. That my friend, is truly awful and frustrating. He has great potential as well but I wouldn't say he's better than Sterling.
I havn't watched Meyer a lot this season, but he's an astonishing talent and may be better than Sterling.
You asked who we think is better, not who has more experience. I've got higher hopes that in 5, 6, 7 years time that Kelechi will make it at the top of the game than I do from Sterling. In his limited first team opportunities and pre season, I see more talent in Kelechi than I do in Sterling.
Martial is the perfect example of what I'd expect an inconsistent young lad with bags of talent to be performing like. Other than him being a rag ****, there's much less to be critical about regarding his performances this season.
A couple of weeks ago in Paris, he absolutely tore apart the world champions' defence to set up Giroud's opening goal. It has obviously and rightly been overshadowed by other events which happened that night but on the pitch he looked superb. I hate to say it, and I seen bugger all of him at Monaco so I firmly hoped he'd be a flop...but he's got some ability. No doubt I'll get lambasted as a rag for daring to suggest that their new golden boy might be better than our new golden boy but that's my opinion and also the opinion of every neutral whom I've had this conversation with.