Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,986
Agree entirely about the standards and lack of accountability but disagree on the video ref because it has worked in every other sport.
It has to be done like rugby. Mic the ref up, mic the video ref up and allow the crowd and tv audience to hear the conversations and 99.9% of the time, like rugby the correct decision will be given.
They will kick and scream about being mic'd up as that is their get out and way to still cheat but fuck em. They are professional refs being paid to deliver a professional performance and they will do as they are told or they can fuck off.
In other sports TV replays are usually an adjunct of technology, and we know that for instance ball tracking technology in cricket and tennis is good enough to get it right 99% of the time. However these tend to be black and white decisions - either the ball would have gone on to hit the stumps or it wouldn't - whereas in football, as in Rugby, many acts that take place are fouls that justify the award of a free kick or penalty only if in the opinion of the referee some subjective element is present. So in Rugby a scrum that just collapses leads to the scrum being reset, but a scrum that is deliberately collapsed is a penalty to the opposition. Likewise handball in football is only an offence if done deliberately.
Perhaps unsurprisingly such decisions tend not to get reviewed in Rugby. The decisions that get reviewed are game changers - e.g. 'There was a possible forward pass in the lead up to that try', or 'was the ball under the control of the player and grounded properly for a try to be awarded'. The real problem Rugby has is that sometimes you can spend a very long time reviewing a decision and still not end up with a clear answer. And of course the more important the occasion the more likely it is that the TV ref will want to get it right. I remember for instance an England try being disallowed by millimetres after and age of replays in the final of the 2007 World Cup.
That said, the advantage Rugby has is that for every excruciating 'cameras don't really make it clear either way' moment in the final of a major tournament there are dozens and dozens of decisions where TV replays enable the ref to get it right with no arguments. I'm not sure how TV reviews would work in practice in football but the opportunity of reducing either incompetence or corruption is in my view well worth the uncertainty.