johnmc
Well-Known Member
I’m a man of contradictions. I don’t believe in the death penalty as such. To murder someone as a consequence of murdering someone seems backward.
But the other part of me says if someone is sentenced to a longer tariff than they will ever live, as these bastards surely will, who is benefitting from keeping them alive. Costs of ££££££ to keep them alive without them having a hope of seeing the outside yet allowing them contact with loved ones that their acts have deprived others of doing. And what do they get out of spending the rest of their lives inside. It’s pointless. Just get rid in cases like this. I am quite pro rehabilitation but murdering children like this over what appears to be a petty feud I would be happy to support their termination.
But the other part of me says if someone is sentenced to a longer tariff than they will ever live, as these bastards surely will, who is benefitting from keeping them alive. Costs of ££££££ to keep them alive without them having a hope of seeing the outside yet allowing them contact with loved ones that their acts have deprived others of doing. And what do they get out of spending the rest of their lives inside. It’s pointless. Just get rid in cases like this. I am quite pro rehabilitation but murdering children like this over what appears to be a petty feud I would be happy to support their termination.