Thaksinssoldier
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 9,999
Job done with the 3 points. Now let him play against City.
Standard.
That's exactly it.
Job done with the 3 points. Now let him play against City.
Standard.
Strong words from Garth Crooks regarding Dean....
It was just as well because referee Mike Dean practically destroyed it with another dismissal this time after only 15 minutes. I'm beginning to wonder whether the Premier League can afford Mike Dean. He's bad for business.
When he sent off Southampton's Nathan Redmond for an innocuous trip on Tottenham's Dele Alli on 28 December I said Dean should "consider his position". Now it's time for the Professional Game Match Official Board to carefully think through whether his judgement has become impaired.
He seems to be the only referee intent on ruining evenly balanced contests for the viewing public by sending players off totally unnecessarily. It's time for him to go.
This
Job done once he was gone and scum got two helping hand with the goal
Now he's back and fresh to play against us
Was a foul given against him (I can't remember)? If it was, that means the ref saw it and dealt with the tackle on the pitch. No retrospective action can then be taken. Er, I think!What one has mentioned is that Dean did not have the balls or the FA to charge Kouyate for the tackle on Mkhitayran.
That's cause they know that would cause fucking uproar .
He was not booked for the challenge so why didn't they review it ?
Was a foul given against him (I can't remember)? If it was, that means the ref saw it and dealt with the tackle on the pitch. No retrospective action can then be taken. Er, I think!
I'm unsure on the technicalities of the rule, to be honest. it's just that something rings a bell. Also, as I said, I couldn't remember if a foul had been given.Think your right actually think a foul was given , what a dick I am anyway cheers for clearing that up for me .
I'm unsure on the technicalities of the rule, to be honest. it's just that something rings a bell. Also, as I said, I couldn't remember if a foul had been given.
I think the FA have bent that rule once before with us (Thatcher's assault on Mendes), but that was seen as such a bad tackle, it deserved more than the usual punishment. The Hammer's tackle was poor, and deserved a red card, but I don't think it was so poor that the FA would look at it again like they did with Thatcher.As soon as I saw your message it rang a bell straight away , am pretty certain a foul was given but not 100% cause tackles where flying in .
I think the FA have bent that rule once before with us (Thatcher's assault on Mendes), but that was seen as such a bad tackle, it deserved more than the usual punishment. The Hammer's tackle was poor, and deserved a red card, but I don't think it was so poor that the FA would look at it again like they did with Thatcher.