yeseye
Well-Known Member
You mean like the 3 ‘Serious’ trophies they won last year?Tbf, the reported 450k after tax is dependant on bouses, presumably for winning serious trophies, so it's 350.
You mean like the 3 ‘Serious’ trophies they won last year?Tbf, the reported 450k after tax is dependant on bouses, presumably for winning serious trophies, so it's 350.
You mean like the 3 ‘Serious’ trophies they won last year?
This guy was a bit part player in a Barcelona team so decided to go to Arsenal to get first team football. When faced with being the odd person out between himself, Sterling and Sane he took the money and ran to United.
Would have been a good icing on the cake player for us for a couple of seasons. Moving him on afterwards would have been difficult even with the wages we were going to be paying him, let the rags sort that payoff out not us.
They wont make the final if thats what you mean by the winner?If Sanchez scores the winner for them in the Champs League, would that justify the cost?
Are we talking group stages or the knockout stages?If Sanchez scores the winner for them in the Champs League, would that justify the cost?
I've seen it reported as 600k after bonuses - 350k basic and 100k image rights. So 450k.
The most laughable aspect of this saga is the bizarre belief of so many rags that the Sanchez transfer has cost them nothing because 'no money has changed hands'. So it's just cost them the bulk of Mkhitaryan's £30 million transfer fee which hadn't been amortised, Sanchez's £20 million signing on fee and his agent's £15 million bung. I make that the thick end of £60 million. Plus the wages of circa £450,000 a week, apparently after tax, on a 4 1/2 year contract. I should be used to it now but the mind boglles at their ignorance, delusion and stupidity.
Sevilla aren't that formidable mate.If Sanchez scores the winner for them in the Champs League, would that justify the cost?