nmc
Well-Known Member
.. And our deficit !Check out Germany's trade surplus.
.. And our deficit !Check out Germany's trade surplus.
Ryton was the most efficient and best quality producer of cars when compared against other Peugeot plants across Europe. It was closed because the labour laws in France and Germany require the employer to spend a whole lot more time and money when closing factories and laying workers off, such as investing in finding them new jobs, paying them considerably more in redundancy, and requiring much longer periods leading up to lay-off. With labour laws being pitiful in this country, it was cheaper for them to close Ryton.
You are right - often British factories are criticised but Ryton had good quality and low costs - it became a victim because closing it was easy and cheap. British labour laws are the worst in Europe and post Brexit they may get worse.
Are you really suggesting labour laws might get better under a Conservative government?So they may get better then??
How can this be? Surely our EU membership ensures that workers rights are brilliant and so much better than if we had never joined?You are right - often British factories are criticised but Ryton had good quality and low costs - it became a victim because closing it was easy and cheap. British labour laws are the worst in Europe and post Brexit they may get worse.
Can someone explain something to me please
Peugeot are looking to purchase Vauxhall Ellesmere Port and the danger then is that they will close the factory and move all operations over to mainland Europe to protect French and German jobs
Peugeot is 13% French government owned
When it was all kicking off in South Wales regarding the steel plant that TATA was looking to mothball, the UK government said they couldn't get involved or subsidise as it was against EU regulations
Is there a conflict here between what the UK abides to and the rest of Europe?
Can someone explain something to me please
Peugeot are looking to purchase Vauxhall Ellesmere Port and the danger then is that they will close the factory and move all operations over to mainland Europe to protect French and German jobs
Peugeot is 13% French government owned
When it was all kicking off in South Wales regarding the steel plant that TATA was looking to mothball, the UK government said they couldn't get involved or subsidise as it was against EU regulations
Is there a conflict here between what the UK abides to and the rest of Europe?
To be fair that is a situation of our own making. When thatcher flogged off utilities to ensure competition and low prices, she created a greedy price fixing cartel that constantly hikes prices beyond inflationYes.... EDF Electricity is largely owned by the French state and the rates in France are a lot cheaper than in the UK.
How can this be? Surely our EU membership ensures that workers rights are brilliant and so much better than if we had never joined?
Your monosyllabic answer to his non-trivial question is misleading in that it implies it is "us" vs "them", i.e. that we want to do something and 27 other states want to stop us.
But it is not that way at all. It is simply that in the EU, we are all bound by the same rules THAT WE VOTED FOR. We agreed when forming these rules, that it was sensible to have a level playing field and not allow any one government to prop up their own businesses to the detriment of workers in other countries. We decided we wanted fair competition across the 28 markets, i.e. a good idea.