This is not meaning to be a pro Sven (he's gone, good or bad) thread even if it maybe looks like that. It's just that I'm surprised over some people's views.
I'm getting a little surprised about so many slagging us and Sven off last year.
Apart from the 8-1 lost to Middelsbrough when there was more or less chaos and maybe that was Svens fault when telling the players he was leaving.
So apart from the 8-1 lost this happened.
We came from relegation battle.
Sven inherited a weak squad (we're talking samaras, Corradi , Mpenza up front).
Sven and his crew came in very late and had to buy quick and take many risks in the transfermarket just to have a squad. I
think it's obvious that some of the buys would be good and some of the buys would be bad. Then he would asess the squand
and buy more in january or for the next season as this was a 3-year-project.
- We hade a great start at the season
- We beat the rags twice (with that squad)
- There was no money to buy the players Sven wanted and had been promised in the januarywindow and we really bd needed a striker so
the solution was getting Benjani. I don't think Caceido was a panicbuy - rather a buy for the future. We were low on strikers so he had
a few games despite the fact that he wasn't bought for that season.
- Our perfomance second half was below par but we were also comparing with our great start.
So in the end we wanted UEFA but couldn't make it through league postion but instead got it through Fair Play.
We went from relegationbattle to a safe 9:th place.
If any of you remember what the paper wrote and the bookies said was that we had to be in a relegationbattle again becuase Sven bought unknowns
and had too little time and we were shite. It proved to be wrong. AND WE BEAT THE RAGS TWICE chalalalala
______________________
We get two new players that without question are in the starting eleven SWP and Robinho.
We also get some players that could come out great JO, Kompmany, Zalabeta, Ben-Haim...
so the vies are........
Hughes inherited a bad team, We shouldn't be able to compete for a top 6-place, It's Sven's fault that we are where we are, jsut because we
hade a really bad end of the season that mean that we would be shite next season with Sven and that had nothing to do at all wit the owner being
sort of crazy.
FFS Hughes has full backing of the owners, a much better squad and still he's right for us ?
If the team can't perform the best on the pitch because thery're not motivated it must be a reason behind that the manager can't handle.
I don't think Mark Hughes wanted it to be like this and I don't believe in firing managers - but there are limitations on how bad you can run.
I'm getting a little surprised about so many slagging us and Sven off last year.
Apart from the 8-1 lost to Middelsbrough when there was more or less chaos and maybe that was Svens fault when telling the players he was leaving.
So apart from the 8-1 lost this happened.
We came from relegation battle.
Sven inherited a weak squad (we're talking samaras, Corradi , Mpenza up front).
Sven and his crew came in very late and had to buy quick and take many risks in the transfermarket just to have a squad. I
think it's obvious that some of the buys would be good and some of the buys would be bad. Then he would asess the squand
and buy more in january or for the next season as this was a 3-year-project.
- We hade a great start at the season
- We beat the rags twice (with that squad)
- There was no money to buy the players Sven wanted and had been promised in the januarywindow and we really bd needed a striker so
the solution was getting Benjani. I don't think Caceido was a panicbuy - rather a buy for the future. We were low on strikers so he had
a few games despite the fact that he wasn't bought for that season.
- Our perfomance second half was below par but we were also comparing with our great start.
So in the end we wanted UEFA but couldn't make it through league postion but instead got it through Fair Play.
We went from relegationbattle to a safe 9:th place.
If any of you remember what the paper wrote and the bookies said was that we had to be in a relegationbattle again becuase Sven bought unknowns
and had too little time and we were shite. It proved to be wrong. AND WE BEAT THE RAGS TWICE chalalalala
______________________
We get two new players that without question are in the starting eleven SWP and Robinho.
We also get some players that could come out great JO, Kompmany, Zalabeta, Ben-Haim...
so the vies are........
Hughes inherited a bad team, We shouldn't be able to compete for a top 6-place, It's Sven's fault that we are where we are, jsut because we
hade a really bad end of the season that mean that we would be shite next season with Sven and that had nothing to do at all wit the owner being
sort of crazy.
FFS Hughes has full backing of the owners, a much better squad and still he's right for us ?
If the team can't perform the best on the pitch because thery're not motivated it must be a reason behind that the manager can't handle.
I don't think Mark Hughes wanted it to be like this and I don't believe in firing managers - but there are limitations on how bad you can run.