Who Should Own MCFC ?

[Bigga]

fuck me i only bumped it cos i thought, how times have changed.

not to have a full scale row about "old posts"

unless you have over 500 posts you must ask an old timer if its ok to post.

That's all I was trying to do. Show how much things've changed.

 

[Project Rain]

Wow. My posts back then were fairly sensible.

WHat teh fuck has happened to me?

Don't worry I always thought you talked shite ;P

 

[carlos tevez is a blue]

It's alright saying that we need a wealthy owner who will use the money wisely but that's probably a pipe-dream.

Take a good look around at how many clubs have rich owners that happily bankroll their club. There's Chelsea and Chelsea and erm Chelsea and then there's Chelsea. Maybe Fulham. Lerner has certainly put money into Villa but it's in the form of shares and loans. The other three of the big four are self-financing, as are Everton, Spurs, Portsmouth, Blackburn, Bolton. West Ham have had a big injection of cash but that was a long-term loan and is being repaid. Not helped them much either. There are to many nobs like Ashley, Kenwright, Madjeski and others who like the idea of owning "their" club but aren't going to risk losing serious money. And these people are the ones letting Sky dictate the agenda because it means more money from Sky and less from them. These are the ones letting the players and their agents get away with murder.

I make no apologies for saying that their is only one group of people that really have the long-term interests of the clubs at heart and who could the tough decisions needed to ensure the long-term survival of those clubs and the game in general and that's the fans. It seems to work well enough in Spain & Germany.

How times have changed :)

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

It's alright saying that we need a wealthy owner who will use the money wisely but that's probably a pipe-dream.

Take a good look around at how many clubs have rich owners that happily bankroll their club. There's Chelsea and Chelsea and erm Chelsea and then there's Chelsea. Maybe Fulham. Lerner has certainly put money into Villa but it's in the form of shares and loans. The other three of the big four are self-financing, as are Everton, Spurs, Portsmouth, Blackburn, Bolton. West Ham have had a big injection of cash but that was a long-term loan and is being repaid. Not helped them much either. There are to many nobs like Ashley, Kenwright, Madjeski and others who like the idea of owning "their" club but aren't going to risk losing serious money. And these people are the ones letting Sky dictate the agenda because it means more money from Sky and less from them. These are the ones letting the players and their agents get away with murder.

I make no apologies for saying that their is only one group of people that really have the long-term interests of the clubs at heart and who could the tough decisions needed to ensure the long-term survival of those clubs and the game in general and that's the fans. It seems to work well enough in Spain & Germany.

How times have changed :)

Written 2 weeks before ADUG took us over as well. That's why I don't do the lottery. We have been really lucky with the owners we now have.

 

[ragmans_trumpet]

Money is now the only way of winning so I just want the richest mo' fo' there is to own City - how complicated can it get???

 

[u2fme2]

here we go again
IF.IF.IF,,BUT

 

[carlos tevez is a blue]

Thought I would bump this to see how things have changed.

 

[Big G]

Big G said he was going to buy Frank out on here, the other day. Forward with Big G, I say.

Still think I should have pursued it?

 

[gaudinho's stolen car]

Big G said he was going to buy Frank out on here, the other day. Forward with Big G, I say.

Still think I should have pursued it?

It's never too late.

 

[Mad Eyed Screamer]

Just read this from page 1..... took me half way down page 2 until I realised it wasnt a new thread!!!! LOL