Young wrote:
Hazard's a WUM.
Evidence?
-- Mon May 21, 2012 10:45 am --
Manc in London wrote:
Hazard comes across as a bit of self-indulgent prat.
Evidence?
-- Mon May 21, 2012 10:46 am --
Scotland_WC2010 wrote:
No matter what team gets him, they will only have him for a few season before he goes to Real Madrid.
Reasoning?
-- Mon May 21, 2012 10:49 am --
kp220 wrote:
tolmie's hairdoo wrote:
Hazard is getting a really rough deal it would appear.
He's a young lad with a young family to consider and signing away the next five years of his life.
Some pertinent facts, unlike the links to both United and Chelsea, only one club has taken the trouble to invite him to their stadium and show him properties.
Only one club and one manager has put across their plans, hopes and long-term visions.
Just like Yaya, Silva and Nasri, this episode shares a lot of hallmarks, the late entry of another club etc.
There are three players at Chelsea in Lampard, Torres Terry who have parity clauses which keep them in line with the top earner at the club.
The top line is way below £200k a week, and yet we see ridiculous sums of £300k a week now being thrown into the mix for Hazard.
Abramovich will not pay those sums, and neither will we.
The boy will have his say, let him have it when it is only relevant to do so.
Fully with you on this one Tolmie. Given his age and being so "in demand" its only right that he considers all the options open to him, I get the feeling that he won't let his Agent dictate where he should go.
I'm sure Vinnie will have a quiet word about our setup when they meet up with the Belgian team and I doubt the idea of joining a team with no Manager, question marks over Drogba, Torres and a tosser like Terry as Captain will appeal very much.
Why do you; 'get the feeling his agent wont dictate where he should go' - evidence for that?
Login
Register
FAQ
