Well few months ago the attitude here was who is Wilshere, english hype and why should Balotelli even know him. So would you take the english hype instead of worlds best young player Balotelli?

Wilshere has more talent now than balotelli will ever have, and he is considerably younger, so yeah!

I'll answer the question, with a question! What would wenger do with balo?

Different players but yeh, Wilshire would be much more useful to our set up at the moment. Dont think you will miss Fabregas too much once he pops off to Barca.

Fair play to Wenger for picking him up.

He is a snidey little fucker though, little kicks and pulls for 90 mins. But they are subtle enough to get away with. Where as Mario is full on assault.

Just to add, I think the loan to Bolton really helped him. So well done to Wenger for that too. Dammit!!

Have Sex with him?

Just one word: Yes

YES

No manager can do anything if the player doesnt want to. So no I dont think Wenger could do anything mancini couldnt do.

Yes for the simple reason that we are lacking the type of player Wilshere is (Midfield General kind of player) more than whatever Balotelli is supposed to be.

Different type of player playing in a completely different position.

And your question - and the timing of it - smacks of gloating and rubbing it in.

I would love to have Wiltshire here as, like another poster has said, he would be perfect for our midfield.

But your question would be more appropiate as 'Would we swap Balo for Van Persie or Bentdner?', and to that I would say no. A resounding no.