Bluemoon-MCFC - Manchester City Football Club Manchester City Football Club - The Pride of Manchester
Bluemoon-MCFC Manchester City message board  
It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 6:20 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:01 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 17461
Location: Walking naked through the deserts of Tatooine

These ads are only displayed to guests.
Please login to remove them.

Rascal wrote:

Thats a statement that suprises me.

Marx was a libertarian, Hitler was Authoritarian.

As it does me, my respect for GDM has plummeted. In fact, there's nothing left.

He was no Bakunin but he was a long way from authoritarian. Look at his enthusiasm for the Paris Commune and compare that to how the Communist (big C) countries turned out and there's a world of difference. Like Orwell after him, who also felt the brief explosion of excitement in something resembling the Paris Commune (revolutionary Catalonia), and I believe, like Orwell, he would have opposed the Communist regimes as a perversion of his ideals. I do not buy, that Marx, who despised the level of control exercised over us by a capitalist system, would endorse an even more authoritarian one. It is at odds with what we know as fact and what we can fairly speculate as well.

Orwell wrote:
Socialism means a classless society, or it means nothing at all. And it was here that those few months in the militia were valuable to me. For the Spanish militias, while they lasted, were a sort of microcosm of a classless society. In that community where no one was on the make, where there was a shortage of everything but no privilege and no bootlicking, one got, perhaps, a crude forecast of what the opening stages of socialism might be like. And, after all, instead of disillusioning me it deeply attracted me. The effect was to make my desire to see socialism established much more actual than it had been before.


I cannot find the exact quote I wanted from Orwell but the excitement of these two men as they separately experienced, for a very brief time, the society in which they forever wished to live, is very palpable, and they have in common that they were nothing like Communist China or the USSR, or North Korea etc.


Last edited by Skashion on Sat May 05, 2012 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 3462
Location: USA! USA! USA!
I think it's a little bit more of a coincidence that Barack Obama just happens to be president on Marx's birthday.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:44 pm
Posts: 50721
Location: El Presidente of the cellar
Skashion wrote:
Rascal wrote:

Thats a statement that suprises me.

Marx was a libertarian, Hitler was Authoritarian.

As it does me, my respect for GDM has plummeted. In fact, there's nothing left.

He was no Bakunin but he was a long way from authoritarian. Look at his enthusiasm for the Paris Commune and compare that to how the Communist (big C) countries turned out and there's a world of difference. Like Orwell after him, who also felt the brief explosion of excitement in something resembling the Paris Commune (revolutionary Catalonia), and I believe, like Orwell, he would have opposed the Communist regimes as a perversion of his ideals. I do not buy, that Marx, who despised the level of control exercised over us by a capitalist system, would endorse an even more authoritarian one. It is at odds with what we know as fact and what we can fairly speculate as well.

Orwell wrote:
Socialism means a classless society, or it means nothing at all. And it was here that those few months in the militia were valuable to me. For the Spanish militias, while they lasted, were a sort of microcosm of a classless society. In that community where no one was on the make, where there was a shortage of everything but no privilege and no bootlicking, one got, perhaps, a crude forecast of what the opening stages of socialism might be like. And, after all, instead of disillusioning me it deeply attracted me. The effect was to make my desire to see socialism established much more actual than it had been before.


I cannot find the exact quote I wanted from Orwell but the excitement of these two men as they separately experienced, for a very brief time, the society in which they forever wished to live, is very palpable, and they have in common that they were nothing like Communist China or the USSR, or North Korea etc.


This is without doubt one of the best posts ever on BM

In the category of serious posts of course

-- Sat May 05, 2012 9:17 pm --

buckshot wrote:
I think it's a little bit more of a coincidence that Barack Obama just happens to be president on Marx's birthday.


Is it headline news on Fox?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:09 pm
Posts: 31593
Location: The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.
Rascal wrote:
Skashion wrote:
He was a good man, that others abused and warped his theories into something he'd have despised and used them to exercise control and oppress people, does not change that one iota.


Agreed.

A man born in 1818 had such vision his theories are still relevant today and perhaps they always will be.

Nah. Not for me. His theories were always utopian and unworkable anywhere that free human will and nature existed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:16 pm
Posts: 4185
Location: Old fucking Trafford.
Skashion wrote:
Rascal wrote:

Thats a statement that suprises me.

Marx was a libertarian, Hitler was Authoritarian.

As it does me, my respect for GDM has plummeted. In fact, there's nothing left.

He was no Bakunin but he was a long way from authoritarian. Look at his enthusiasm for the Paris Commune and compare that to how the Communist (big C) countries turned out and there's a world of difference. Like Orwell after him, who also felt the brief explosion of excitement in something resembling the Paris Commune (revolutionary Catalonia), and I believe, like Orwell, he would have opposed the Communist regimes as a perversion of his ideals. I do not buy, that Marx, who despised the level of control exercised over us by a capitalist system, would endorse an even more authoritarian one. It is at odds with what we know as fact and what we can fairly speculate as well.

Orwell wrote:
Socialism means a classless society, or it means nothing at all. And it was here that those few months in the militia were valuable to me. For the Spanish militias, while they lasted, were a sort of microcosm of a classless society. In that community where no one was on the make, where there was a shortage of everything but no privilege and no bootlicking, one got, perhaps, a crude forecast of what the opening stages of socialism might be like. And, after all, instead of disillusioning me it deeply attracted me. The effect was to make my desire to see socialism established much more actual than it had been before.


I cannot find the exact quote I wanted from Orwell but the excitement of these two men as they separately experienced, for a very brief time, the society in which they forever wished to live, is very palpable, and they have in common that they were nothing like Communist China or the USSR, or North Korea etc.


I'm don't know much about politics but i've always been interested in Marx after hearing his connection with Manchester and obviously Orwell due to 1984. Your post has enlightened me somewhat. Cheers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 28188
Location: Dafuq is this shit
SWP's back wrote:
Rascal wrote:
Skashion wrote:
He was a good man, that others abused and warped his theories into something he'd have despised and used them to exercise control and oppress people, does not change that one iota.


Agreed.

A man born in 1818 had such vision his theories are still relevant today and perhaps they always will be.

Nah. Not for me. His theories were always utopian and unworkable anywhere that free human will and nature existed.


Thats pretty much where i stand. Humans would need to lack emotion and be almost robotic in there ways to conform to the idea


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:09 pm
Posts: 31593
Location: The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.
When's our erstwhile London mayors birthday? Now there's a politician.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:44 pm
Posts: 50721
Location: El Presidente of the cellar
BoyBlue_1985 wrote:
SWP's back wrote:
Rascal wrote:

Agreed.

A man born in 1818 had such vision his theories are still relevant today and perhaps they always will be.

Nah. Not for me. His theories were always utopian and unworkable anywhere that free human will and nature existed.


Thats pretty much where i stand. Humans would need to lack emotion and be almost robotic in there ways to conform to the idea


Hooverism swept you up


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 28188
Location: Dafuq is this shit
Rascal wrote:
BoyBlue_1985 wrote:
SWP's back wrote:
Nah. Not for me. His theories were always utopian and unworkable anywhere that free human will and nature existed.


Thats pretty much where i stand. Humans would need to lack emotion and be almost robotic in there ways to conform to the idea


Hooverism swept you up


Hold on I need to look that up!! :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:47 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 17461
Location: Walking naked through the deserts of Tatooine
I think that most would agree the following demands from the Communist Manifesto remain quite relevant. Others might add others to that list but those three are pretty non-controversial amongst all but the most hardline anarcho-capitalists.

A progressive tax system
Free education to all
Abolition of child labour

I don't have any real issue with people who say Marx's ideas would never work. Most people remain hostile to even a stateless society, much less an egalitarian one based on from each according to their ability to each according to their need. I think most people would be more willing to embrace a dictatorship of the proletariat in permanence but I still take no issue with people saying that would never work. Saying he caused more human suffering than Hitler though... Beyond bullshit. It's not something that any well-educated person should say. I'm not talking ins and outs of political writings. I'm not calling for everyone who wants to talk about Marx to be as well versed on him as I am. That's my forte and I recognise my strengths in this area in the same way that I recognise strengths of others in other areas e.g. SWP's Back in economics, Damocles in physics etc. - and therefore listen to them and try to educate myself, rather than make outlandish claims. Well-educated people, in short, should know when it is better to let people think them fools (on a certain topic) than open their mouths and remove all doubt.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next


All times are UTC [ DST ]


 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Apple, Chairman Wesker, ciderjohn1, citycanada, sheikmedick, uwerosler28 and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  

© bluemoon-mcfc 2013 Produced by Ric Turner


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.149s | 11 Queries | GZIP : On ]