Ablue Dhabi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2016
- Messages
- 69
Make them simultaneous. Ref blows the whistle and you have 3 seconds to put foot to ball. Split screen in the stands and on the television. First to 5 wins. I prefer golden goal myself.
Bit harsh on the OP, what are your thoughts on the penalties ?Stupid and unnecessary.
Should scrap penalties and it should go to which team has the fittest supporter in the stands. Paraguay would have 3 world cups now.
UEFA would never do anything that benefits City.with allsort of stats available why don't they have a points system for the best team in the game and that way the attacking teams would be the winners and good for football when you know you have to play and attack and not park the bus then win it on pens
I wonder what the stats are for home teams winning the shootout? Because the away team will generally choose the end of the ground that has their supporters over the first penalty. In fact, what are the stats for the team at home in the second leg of two legged ties going through? That's about 70% iirc...Potentially, yeah.
It is still a lottery, but if you buy one ticket, and I buy one ticket, we should have an equal chance of winning! With your logic - why bother with the penalty shoot out at all - just decide it on whoever wins the coin toss. "Anyone that complains should have done the business during the game".
I wonder what the stats are for home teams winning the shootout? Because the away team will generally choose the end of the ground that has their supporters over the first penalty.
In fact, what are the stats for the team at home in the second leg of two legged ties going through? That's about 70% iirc...
Maybe we should play all knockout games at neutral venues?
UEFA would never do anything that benefits City.
:)