Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
In one sense you're absolutely right of course but CB's point was that we should accept these things on the basis that they're for the good of the club and the impact on the individual shouldn't be a factor but that depends on the context.That's not remotely relatable to the situation.
You're trying to build yourself a thumping great strawman there.
If United Airlines were in a desperate financial situation and Munoz gave CB and his fellow pilots a choice of losing 25% of their jobs or suffering no staff losses but losing 25% of their income then they might well be grateful to accept the latter offer.
But if UA was increasing profits and the samr thing happened then they'd probably feel hard done by.
If City want the ground to be full and the crowd to generate a great atmosphere then it has to recognise that isn't going to happen with more and more premium seats and shunting the cheaper seats to the extremities of the stadium.