let alone, even in the simplest of english terms, "0-0. manchester city win 4-1 on penalties" states the obvious as fact.There is though. The IFAB say that when a game needs a winner (which that one-off LC game did) then the winner can be determined by extra time and/or a penalty shoot out. The LC accept it as a win; the FA say that they also accept it as a win etc. The issue comes with statistic websites/spreadsheets that don't have capacity to record it as a win. Companies/statisticians that base their records on spreadsheets struggle with this, but those that have maintained records since footy began (such as the Nationwide Football Annual which under various names has been in existence for over 130 years) have confirmed they recognise it.
City ruining spreadsheets since 2008
Regarding the Wolves result, the way I see it is this:
In the league there are 3 possible results; win, draw, lose
In the cup there are only 2 possible results; win, lose.
And there are 3 possible ways of winning a cup tie; win after 90 minutes, win after 120 minutes, win on penalties
The match was a draw. The tie was settled by penalties after the match had finished. That's why a penalty scored in the shoot out doesn't go on a players goal tally.I keep hearing this, but doesn’t the draw with Wolves go down as a 0-0 in 90 mins?
Loldo we share the capital one cup with Liverpool?
There's actually 4. You forgot to include having Alan Wilkie as the ref.And there are 3 possible ways of winning a cup tie; win after 90 minutes, win after 120 minutes, win on penalties