uwe rosler 28
Well-Known Member
What difference does it make? None!
It makes a big difference if he plays it means arsenal are still fucking us about and we should walk there is also a chance he picks up an injury
What difference does it make? None!
Was it KDB? ;)
It makes a big difference if he plays it means arsenal are still fucking us about and we should walk there is also a chance he picks up an injury
This confirms what I thought. A combination of injury and an unprecedented opportunity for trophies has resurrected the old deal.We had no intention of buying Sanchez in January until the Jesus injury, none whatsoever.
Gabs' knee problem was one day before the window reopened.
We had been working and appropriating money for other targets.
Day 1 was never a contender.
I disagree...he's cup-tied and is still contracted to the club for the time being.
Arsenal's only realistic chance of silverware so will field their strongest side.
I've no problem with him playing just if he does I hope we walk away till the summer
Thank fk you are nothing to do with the decision making at this club then.I've no problem with him playing just if he does I hope we walk away till the summer
If we had offered 75 million for him in December distorting the transfer market while selling KDB to finiance it then he would of been here. Seriously we are trying to get him for the right price, which is how we did the deal for Sterling, Mendy and KDB. I would love him here tomorrow for any price, but that isnt how MCFC do there deals anymore. Other than City fans, does it make any difference if we sign him at the end of the window.We had no intention of buying Sanchez in January until the Jesus injury, none whatsoever.
Gabs' knee problem was one day before the window reopened.
We had been working and appropriating money for other targets.
Day 1 was never a contender.
I've no problem with him playing just if he does I hope we walk away till the summer
RVP situaution was different as at the time we had four strikers and I believe he wanted to play every game.Are the rags in for him, then?
This reminds me of the RVP situation. Sanchez has a bit of an odour about him, and he’s no Spring chicken, but could be a very useful short term asset.
RVP situaution was different as at the time we had four strikers and I believe he wanted to play every game.
With Dortmund, Atletico, Napoli, Lyon and Milan in there, I don't think Arsenal have much hope at all of winning the Europa League personally.My take is I think Wenger wants to keep Ozil and Sanchez until the Summer.
They have a good chance at winning the Europa which gives them CL qualifications.
If Sanchez and Ozil go that chance is reduced.
Battle between Wenger and the money men, usually the money men win out.
oh right, sorry misread it. Another view is that (I know it has nothing to do with City) is if Arsenal are intending to move Wenger upstairs(only rumours) the players they are after, if genuine, are unlikely to sign before the summer. This could be why Wenger is trying his hardest to stop him coming here.He means from Utd's point of view.
Signing RVP was a big move for them, but short term.
One off night and they are out of the europa league, plus he won’t play his strongest side in it, that would be a hell of a gambleMy take is I think Wenger wants to keep Ozil and Sanchez until the Summer.
They have a good chance at winning the Europa which gives them CL qualifications.
If Sanchez and Ozil go that chance is reduced.
Battle between Wenger and the money men, usually the money men win out.
Its as nuanced as Arsenal want it to be - would you agree?If you think the situation is black and white sure. Suspect it's a bit more nuanced though.