my thoughts all along, we have been constantly told all had been agreed with player and his cohorts, so if he's shit on us for for a few more mil to the millions he already has, then he can do one
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Alexis Sanchez
- Thread starter Decepticon
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
my thoughts all along, we have been constantly told all had been agreed with player and his cohorts, so if he's shit on us for for a few more mil to the millions he already has, then he can do one
balotelli's back pocket
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 9,473
Alright Stalin, if you don't like it don't read it.He will be playing in a red shirt. Close this thread
Could it be that Arsenal via Cross are saying he has had his head turned by the rags to try and get us to pay up? Just putting it out there...
Not just Cross, the Guardian broke it earlier.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
That would be the 1.6 million quid a month in his pocket.
1.73 million mate. Unless his pocket has a hole in it.
Lancet Fluke
Well-Known Member
Nah. TBH I suspect we will lose today but I still wouldn't want us to blow our pay structure to bits for a 29 year old who has been in poor form. If we get him on our terms then great, let's see how much he adds to our team. But if united get him on 400k a week I am fine with that. They have plenty of decent players already and they're still no great shakes, I genuinely don't see throwing one more in to the mix being a game changer, especially when we know that in an ideal world he'd rather be playing for Pep.I suspect the result of the Liverpool game later will change people's opinions on this one way or another.
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
It dosnt necessarily follow like that.It's not worth ruining or wage structure and possibly having some very unhappy players on our hands. Sterling needs to renew soon, imagine how much we would have to pay him if we gave Sanchez 400k p.w.
geoff clipp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 1,389
It's hard to see how we could pay £400k a week in wages without our entire wage structure spiralling out of control. We have other players who are much more important to us than Sanchez would be and we cant justify giving him that much and not the others. Guess United only really have Pogba and De Gea who they would be truly worried about pissing off. I suspect Real will go for De Gea again in the summer anyway.
Tricky_Trev
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 33,246
We were blown out of the water, essentially. It's what we used to have to do to compete.
balotelli's back pocket
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 9,473
Who at the guardian? Was it another Arsenal mouthpiece?Not just Cross, the Guardian broke it earlier.
I'm with you on this Ric....we got to always be one step ahead of the pack, if we want to stay on top. Very rare a forward of his talent becomes available for such a low price! Feeling like Alves all over again. Genuine question....Do you feel we got "too" confident in this transfer? Expecting the "Pep factor" to trump the money on offer. Feels like we tried to get to clever thinking he coming on a free and allowed Rags to jump ahead (if rumours are true!)
Hope we're not getting complacent again. We made the same mistakes in 2012 and 2014 missing out on the likes of Hazard, RVP and Alexis then to United/Chelsea/Arsenal and making cheap buys.
It's better to buy from a position of strength. It's what kept United at the top.
He will be playing in a red shirt. Close this thread
Beep fucking beep.
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
He’s fucked us about two times now. Here’s to a very unsuccessful few years at United.
balotelli's back pocket
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 9,473
It absolutely does. Sterling is our top scorer, he's young and very marketable. He would be well within his rights to ask to be right up there with Sanchez. Jesus and Sane too.It dosnt necessarily follow like that.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
I suspect the result of the Liverpool game later will change people's opinions on this one way or another.
Fcukinell mate. The Mersey will be clogged up with bodies if we lose!
City Raider
Well-Known Member
Will be a shame if we miss out on a player whose best years have corresponded with Arsenal's worst.
Who at the guardian? Was it another Arsenal mouthpiece?
http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/alexis-sanchez.321724/page-3731#post-10720821
manimanc
Well-Known Member
If arsenal are offered 20m and 35m it's a no brainer which one they go for.
If gabby was out for the season I think we'd fight it but he's back soon so it's a case of oh well never mind.
Shows how far the tide has turned between us and them lot.
We used to be desperate and throw ridiculous amounts of money at players.
Now we wear the trousers and can say take it or leave it.
I find it absolutely hilarious that utd are so desperate.
As you were.
If gabby was out for the season I think we'd fight it but he's back soon so it's a case of oh well never mind.
Shows how far the tide has turned between us and them lot.
We used to be desperate and throw ridiculous amounts of money at players.
Now we wear the trousers and can say take it or leave it.
I find it absolutely hilarious that utd are so desperate.
As you were.
goalmole
Well-Known Member
We are always quiet on transfers. We never give a running commentary, or make announcements unless and until a player signs for us. You won't hear s peep from City. It's how we do things these days.The question is, why are we so quiet?
Fcukinell mate. The Mersey will be clogged up with bodies if we lose!
The world will come to end on here if we lose... being potentially only 12 points clear is irrelevant.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.