Sane wasn’t offside. All of this “let’s just say” shit, if my Auntie had bollocks and all that.
Exactly. Make an argument against it by proving yourself wrong. lost for words
Sane wasn’t offside. All of this “let’s just say” shit, if my Auntie had bollocks and all that.
He said it right after they reviewed the tackle when asked.He said at half time it should only be used for factual decisions. When did he say VAR should be used for red cards unless he has a flexible definition of 'factual' (which is possible - he is not the brightest...)
They are played live. You mean live on TV. I’m still struggling with what your point about lower leagues is?Not League 1 and 2
But the Ref made a decision assuming he was so valid point.Sane wasn’t offside. All of this “let’s just say” shit, if my Auntie had bollocks and all that.
But they are recorded in full, for highlights shows, for retrospective action and for posterity.Not in League's 1 and 2.
Let’s just say you wasn’t lost for words and you had a virgina, would you be someone’s Aunt? ;)Exactly. Make an argument against it by proving yourself wrong. lost for words
Sane wasn’t offside. All of this “let’s just say” shit, if my Auntie had bollocks and all that.
They are played live. You mean live on TV. I’m still struggling with what your point about lower leagues is?
Let’s just say you wasn’t lost for words and you had a virgina, would you be someone’s Aunt? ;)
Actually it was the linesman, Mason gave the goal twice. So no, not a valid point. You’re just making shit up with your “let’s just say” bollocks.But the Ref made a decision assuming he was so valid point.
As i said, that was clear cut but most are not. Look at the number of bad tackles we have all complained about that never got retrospective action.He said it right after they reviewed the tackle when asked.
Btw, what's not factual about making contact halfway up someone's shin with your entire body off the ground?
Would you say it was a "clear and obvious mistake"?As i said, that was clear cut but most are not. Look at the number of bad tackles we have all complained about that never got retrospective action.
But they are recorded in full, for highlights shows, for retrospective action and for posterity.
The linesman was not in a position to decide if Sane was interfering. The ref did that so not making things up.Actually it was the linesman, Mason gave the goal twice. So no, not a valid point. You’re just making shit up with your “let’s just say” bollocks.
Yes. They will use it for all clubs. When they're ready. What they're doing now is called a trial.If they will use VAR for all clubs then there shouldn't be a problem with using it.
Yet the linesman made "a clear and obvious error"?The linesman was not in a position to decide if Sane was interfering. The ref did that so not making things up.
Good point. I would yes but that guideline has already gone out of the window with the amount of marginal and subjective decisions through VAR so far.Would you say it was a "clear and obvious mistake"?
Let’s just say you are though. Have you read Mason’s match report? How do you know what he has written in it regarding the disallowed goal? Let’s just say you’re guessing.The linesman was not in a position to decide if Sane was interfering. The ref did that so not making things up.
The linesman was not in a position to decide if Sane was interfering. The ref did that so not making things up.
Exactly mate.Yet the linesman made "a clear and obvious error"?