Eden Hazard

It seems he will stay


I'd say that video shows the opposite. The fact Rudiger even mentions it shows that the Chelsea squad know he's considering leaving. It would have been easy for him to say, "of course I want to stay, why would I leave, we won the title last season and the FA Cup this season, etc", but he avoided the question.

Based on that video, I'd say he wants to go. The question then is will Chelsea sell. I'd lean towards no, especially to another English club.
 
Pretty sure Chelsea won’t sell to us even for £150m. We’d need to offer absolutely stupid money to tempt them. His agent is probably using us as a bargaining chip in order to force a move to Real Madrid, which would be a far more palatable destination for Chelsea and their supporters.
 
What is incredible about Hazard is his ability to keeps the ball in most situations. Even when he has three or four players around him his body shape and ability to protect the ball means he never loses it.
 
What is incredible about Hazard is his ability to keeps the ball in most situations. Even when he has three or four players around him his body shape and ability to protect the ball means he never loses it.
Pep's quoted as saying that the special players are those who can both pass as well as never lose the ball in Pep Confidencial >_>
 
Great player.but I think Sane will be our Hazard, in fact he'll be our Ronaldo so no for me at the price being mentioned.
 
This is my take on the Hazard rumours. For the person who said Hazard doesn't "carry" Chelsea. He's been carrying them since he was 22.



And this is supposed to be a down season in which him and Chelsea have struggled. He's consistently one of the best creator and dribblers in world football and can be unplayable at times.

Under Pep, he'll all but double his goals and assists tally. I don't think some of us understand how much playing for a very defensive manager can hamper a player yet Hazard has been one of the best players in Europe since he arrived in the league. In almost every game Chelsea plays against one of the other big teams, Hazard has to play on the counter attack and feed off scraps yet he finds a way to be influential.

He's had to play under Mourinho and Conte for virtually all his Chelsea career and even before them Di Matteo and Benitez. He's never played for an attacking manager before. Pep can turn him into the best player in the world. Having him in this side will take City to the next level in Champions league. I see why Pep will want to sign him now. I think its a possible signing with Chelsea in Europa league and Hazard being 27. If he doesn't leave now he'll be 29 next time he plays in the CL and there's no guarantee Chelsea will be in any sort of position to be relevant in that competition any time soon. We HAVE to go big for him I feel. Or at least try.

Top post. He is a top talent frustrated in an average side. Yes, his attitude shows on the pitch and he tries too hard to do it all himself but that would change in the first minute on the pitch with us. And he is an amazing dynamic player.
 
What is incredible about Hazard is his ability to keeps the ball in most situations. Even when he has three or four players around him his body shape and ability to protect the ball means he never loses it.
Like Silva and Bernardo then.
No way is Hazard comming to us for next season. It won't happen. The only way is if he stays till the end of his contract next summer. And who would he replace at City?
 
He would be a revelation in this City team under Pep. I think you would see a totally different player for City, with regards to performances and attitude.
If he wants to leave Chelsea they will try to direct him away from England, so still unlikely he'll end up here.
 
Like Silva and Bernardo then.
No way is Hazard comming to us for next season. It won't happen. The only way is if he stays till the end of his contract next summer. And who would he replace at City?
I'll answer my own question - unless Sterling or Sane is off to Real it would be as a striker! Jesus or Auguero.
 
Watching this game how would we know, every time he got forward his wing backs and midfield were now where to be seen and Giroud was arriving eventually. He had no choice but to try and do it himself.

I disagree. I paid particular attention to him in the final third and on most occasions, he runs with his head down not seeing what is about him. There was more than one occasion, Giroud was in a far more threatening position ahead of Hazard, but because his head was down, he never saw him.

A fantastic player all the same who I would love in sky blue, but he would have to realise, he would be amongst equals and expected to use those around him more so than he does at the Chavs
 
I disagree. I paid particular attention to him in the final third and on most occasions, he runs with his head down not seeing what is about him. There was more than one occasion, Giroud was in a far more threatening position ahead of Hazard, but because his head was down, he never saw him.

A fantastic player all the same who I would love in sky blue, but he would have to realise, he would be amongst equals and expected to use those around him more so than he does at the Chavs
Think I'd actually prefer Mahrez, for that very reason, I think Hazard would get in the way of Sane in particular developing into a great player. So even though I think Hazard would be a better team player with us and is a very good player not sure he would be a good squad player which is what we need more .
 
Think I'd actually prefer Mahrez, for that very reason, I think Hazard would get in the way of Sane in particular developing into a great player. So even though I think Hazard would be a better team player with us and is a very good player not sure he would be a good squad player which is what we need more .
Surely Hazard is more capable of playing down the middle than Mahrez? They could both play as a 10, but I don't really see Mahrez playing as a 9. Hazard definitely could. So that means Mahrez is more likely to prevent the development of Sane (or Sterling).

Personally I think we definitely need another top quality wide player in the squad, so don't mind us signing either. However, given Hazard is better and also provides another option for the central role, I'd prefer him.
 
Hazard under Pep is a dream made in heaven. Hazard is, as Mancini would have said, a “top, top player”. That’s why it won’t happen. Chelsea would be virtually making sure that they wouldn’t get a sniff at being champions for years to come. A City team including Silva, Hazard, De Bruyne is virtually game over. It’s (almost) unfair.
 
No way is he worth more than £110m.
Players don’t go for “what they are worth” the market as blew up, Courtinho wasn’t worth 100+ million, neither was Dembele. Hazard better then both of them. Hazard for years as had defensive minded managers. Imagine him in a team that attacks
 
I really cant see Chelsea selling him to us and our transfer business has never been about spending 100mil-150mil on any single player.....it just doesnt seem to fit within our transfer policy! We more likely to fill 2 needs like Mahrez and Jorginho for cheaper than throw everything at Hazard.
 
I really cant see Chelsea selling him to us and our transfer business has never been about spending 100mil-150mil on any single player.....it just doesnt seem to fit within our transfer policy! We more likely to fill 2 needs like Mahrez and Jorginho for cheaper than throw everything at Hazard.

We are in a different situation now as regards the transfer market. We had to spread money about in last two summers but - assuming the club can make the numbers work - spending big on a single player makes more sense now. I don't think the club have ever indicated that they would not spend record money for an exceptional player. That will just be the exception rather than the rule; which appears to be buy the best young players for big - if necessary - but not mega money.
 
He’s not keen on chasing back or pressuring the opposition if yesterday is anything to go by.
Absolute world class on the ball and attacking but I don’t feel he offers enough for the outlay we’d be putting down.
Very much a luxury signing which isn’t needed but not one I’d be upset about if it happened. Would be interesting to see what else he’s got to give with a proper coach getting a grip of him.
 
He's one of the best players in the league and indeed the whole of Europe. IF he's available we should sign him as a player that good can only make us even stronger.

The question should never be 'how much does someone cost?', but 'can they improve us?'

Signing him doesn't need to restrict or hold back Sterling or Sané either, we play so many games everyone will get plenty of opportunities. Hazard would be another world class option.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top