SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Thought it was a necessary qualification for second rate journos to make sure they get it right by contradicting themselves.You can sign up and get 1 free article per week but this 'article' isn't worth the effort.
He just uses the phrase 'a high percentage of sponsors' rather an actual figure. He also repeats various DS allegations and states twice that City have 'strongly denied by the club' & 'City strenuously deny all the accusations' but then prints the statement by City in which they refuse to comment. How he can knowingly contradict himself and keep a straight face I'll never know but perhaps given his mugshot they use (the self satisfied smug sneer) tells you everything you need to know about this pond scum.
If you do want to read it it's at:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/sport/city-deserve-european-ban-if-guilty-wlxpwfqrn